Jump to content

User talk:Weegeerunner

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Orlik8 (talk | contribs) at 22:41, 25 March 2015 (→‎PARIS VIOLENCE - slander: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Message

Why do you keep tagging the OUTDrejas page for deletion? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Outdrejas (talk • contribs) 20:36, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Because it is not notable. Contest the deletion instead of removing the tag. Weegeerunner (talk) 20:38, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have contested the deletion. Why do you say it isn't notable?Outdrejas (talk) 20:40, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No reliable sources to state that notability. Weegeerunner (talk) 20:41, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict)@Outdrejas: Contesting the deletion doesn't entitle you to remove the speedy deletion notice. It says on the template that the author of the page may not remove the tag, under any circumstances. It is up to someone else to decide whether the tag can be removed, not the author. --I am k6ka Talk to me! See what I have done 20:43, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The user has been blocked now. Weegeerunner (talk) 20:45, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Message 2

Hey man, (not even sure if this is how I am supposed to ask you something) but you dinged me for a synopsis of Ondi Timoner's new film... I mean... It was a pretty generic synopsis and not advertising at all, and I was wondering what you thought was an advertisement about it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.84.51.93 (talk) 01:16, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Message 3

Why are you precluding philosophical analyses of trypophobia? An excerpt of the dissertation was published in Sou'wester and by an independent press. This phobia is terra incognita. Whether or not philosophy is "relevant" is part of an ongoing discourse, not something to be dismissed before the fact. The article, as it stands now, is lopsided. One scientific study is cited ad nauseum. The philosophic anaysis is taking issue with it on methodological grounds. How is this not relevant? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.171.130.166 (talk) 03:50, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Take it to the talk page, we keep the article at the last version whenever something is discussed. Weegeerunner (talk) 04:28, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Video Game Review Templates

We have already opened discussion on this matter in the WikiProject talk page, see here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Television#Video_game_review_template_being_used_on_Television_articles. No changes should be made until this is resolved. - Drywater2k (talk) 17:30, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. Weegeerunner (talk) 17:44, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

CSD

The article you CSD'd is now a redirect to Careers 360 (Magazine). Cheers -- Aronzak (talk) 20:54, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, alright. Weegeerunner (talk) 20:54, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PARIS VIOLENCE - slander

Hello, I am the foundator and main member of the french band Paris Violence. We have been victims since more than one year of false accusations and slanders which are totally illegal lies coming now to be brought before the courts. We had a long struggle on the french Wikipedia page, with vandalism on our page putting again every hour the same slanderous accusations that appear on the "controversy" section on the english page. French Wikipedia moderators recognized it was an attempt to my person and my work without any real elements, only motivated by malveillance and jealousy. So the french page has been secured for some monthes and is clean again now. I'm sad to see that insults and abuse still pollute the english page. Please delete this section or allow me too. Best regards, Flav parisviolence@laposte.net

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Weegeerunner&oldid=653524618"