User talk:PhantomTech

This user does not mind criticism. Feel free to let them know if they did something wrong. This user also thinks you should do the same to any user as long as you follow some guidelines: remain civil, assume good faith and don't bite.

This is PhantomTech's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: Index, Index, 1: 90 days

Please Note

Your statement about why my initial template was deleted is not the case. "and likely knew that if the did so again on their account that they would be blocked." I initially started page in live instead of sandbox mode. It had been a year since I built a wiki so I was a little rusty. I am currently working on history section for non-passing mentions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.199.149.130 (talk) 13:51, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Desbien: The statement was not made in relation to the reason for deletion of your page. It was made because of the recent warnings you received telling you just that. Deletion logs for the page indicate that it was last created this month, combined with checkuser evidence and the warnings on your page, it is highly unlikely that you were not editing Wikipedia recently. PhantomTech (talk) 15:52, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Edit filter/False positives and User:I believe that we can win

Ready for archive

One of the attempted edits in question was to User:I believe that we can win/sandbox/User:I believe that we can win, which apparently was an attempt to create a userpage through AFC. The user attempted to replace this version with the following three lines:

Made 18 March 2015

I believe that we will win!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oy9JsppEJR8

This is Special:AbuseLog/11785701. Regardless of the content of the link, is it really desirable that our filters prevent the addition of YouTube links to userspace? Without having looked at the video, I can't say whether it's spam or otherwise inappropriate (of course I can imagine that it might be), but the filter can't make that kind of determination, so I assume that this edit would have been prevented regardless of the video's content. There's nothing necessarily wrong with a YouTube link in userspace. Nyttend (talk) 11:46, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Nyttend: You're right, it isn't necessarily a bad thing to have a YouTube video in your user space. I'm not sure (don't have the abusefilter permission so I can't check) but I assume that the filter doesn't block people who are autoconfirmed. If the filter was intended to block user space links also then I assume it was done because a lot of the videos being added were being added in a problematic way, if that's not the case it might be a good idea to change the filter to only warn anyone that's not autoconfirmed about WP:COI and WP:PROMO who tries to post a link. PhantomTech (talk) 14:37, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

YouTube Vids

Ready for archive

I like to sometimes put them up.--Voice Farmer (talk) 00:40, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Voice Farmer: are you referencing the topic above about the filter? PhantomTech (talk) 02:55, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yup. LOL--Voice Farmer (talk) 04:31, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Voice Farmer: Like Nyttend pointed out, it isn't a problem in certain situations, just be sure you're familiar with WP:PROMO and WP:UP. PhantomTech (talk) 05:09, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

my edit on the nestor movie was good!!!!!!!!!!!

Ready for archive

hey I gatta say my works were wight ok — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.132.240.222 (talk) 22:44, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@75.132.240.222: You removed a significant amount of content without an edit summary and replaced it with what appears to be commentary on the article which should be placed on its talk page.

Draft: Grishko

Hi PhantomTech, Thanks for the comments, they were helpful. I have made some changes that I think address the issues you mentioned, would you mind taking a look and telling me what you think? Thanks! Aspaef (talk) 16:45, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Aspaef: It does look a bit improved, unfortunately I've moved away from articles for creation and don't have the time to do a full review of the draft. PhantomTech (talk) 19:36, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

periperiwinkle

This is my first article and I need help! So I cannot refer back to the company I was doing? Please advise! Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Periperiwinkle (talk • contribs) 06:04, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Periperiwinkle: You can get help writing articles at the teahouse. Articles on Wikipedia must meet several policies including WP:NPOV and WP:VERIFIABILITY. You can find a full list of Wikipedia policies at WP:LOP. PhantomTech (talk) 06:09, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:C:9800:5C6:C155:45C8:16A0:D51C (talk) 02:21, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abhay Vidhya Mandir Senior Secondary School, Hindaun City for deletion

Ready for archive

– Aware of discussion. PhantomTech (talk) 19:30, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abhay Vidhya Mandir Senior Secondary School, Hindaun City is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhay Vidhya Mandir Senior Secondary School, Hindaun City until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jerodlycett (talk) 17:53, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refer again my artile

Hello

Please refer my article again because I am working on that to be set properly in wikipedia by under wikipedia guidelines — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ubskjt (talk • contribs) 18:59, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Ubskjt: Please read WP:FIRST along with WP:POL. You might want to consider using Articles for Creation to make your first article. PhantomTech (talk) 19:27, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What about my article i.e gurdip singh anand

Can you please give me my article on gurdip singh anand ?? because yesterday you have delete my article and there is no issues in article so kindly give it back my article User:Ubskjt

@Ubskjt: I marked the article for deletion, I didn't delete it myself. I can't get you a copy of the article but you can see a list of the administrators who deleted it here, one of them might be willing to email you a copy. PhantomTech (talk) 04:33, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can I recreate the article again ??