Jump to content

Talk:Hyperacuity

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Gwestheimer (talk | contribs) at 16:28, 12 April 2015 (Rebuttal of proposal for deletion of entrty). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconDisability Start‑class
WikiProject iconHyperacuity is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.


The newer version of the entry, which had been displayed here as a draft, has been moved to the main page.Gwestheimer 04:01, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

On two occasions 155blue of whom there is no trace otherwise in Wikipedia has objected to this entry, once because it was deemed self-serving and now it is proposed for deletion because it fails the notability guideline. Notability guidelines are not spelled out in Wikipedia, but for the record the term hyperacuity has been in use for 40 years and brings up over 300 references when entered in PubMed as a keyword. Many scientific papers with the word in the title have been cited several hundred times.

The charge that it is written in a rather complicated fashion must, of course, be taken seriously. Many paragraphs are written clearly in lay language, but specific indications of what sections need improvement -- and perhaps even suggestions of how this might be accomplished -- would be welcome. Gwestheimer 16:25, 12 April 2015 (UTC)