Talk:Hyperacuity
Disability Start‑class | |||||||
|
The newer version of the entry, which had been displayed here as a draft, has been moved to the main page.Gwestheimer 04:01, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
On two occasions 155blue of whom there is no trace otherwise in Wikipedia has objected to this entry, once because it was deemed self-serving and now it is proposed for deletion because it fails the notability guideline. Notability guidelines are not spelled out in Wikipedia, but for the record the term hyperacuity has been in use for 40 years and brings up over 300 references when entered in PubMed as a keyword. Many scientific papers with the word in the title have been cited several hundred times.
The charge that it is written in a rather complicated fashion must, of course, be taken seriously. Many paragraphs are written clearly in lay language, but specific indications of what sections need improvement -- and perhaps even suggestions of how this might be accomplished -- would be welcome. Gwestheimer 16:25, 12 April 2015 (UTC)