User:Paul Moss/archive3.html

USER TALK PAGE ARCHIVE #3 ...

here it all is, for posterity, not that anyone would want to read it..

Thought for the day/month/year/decade (you choose)

[[1]]

Allegations vs Objective Reality

Oh Paul, its really not a case of people mixing up Paul Mosses its you. I do not personally know any of the other people who you have little squabbles with on the internet but I imagine there will be many as you just a a horrible person.

You have stolen from my family and I remember it.

10 years is not such a long ago. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.214.11.2 (talk) 13:19, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

10 years is nothing in the scheme of things. As usual with these things there is so much more to the truth. I suppose I could drag out some reality checks but what would it achieve. So yes there are 'SKELETONS in our closets' but some of them are more bizarre than others, and this one is particularly malformed and suffering from lack of balance. It is slightly surprising how humans can simply forget the large sums of money loaned to them, and not paid back, and yet supposedly 'remember' the misunderstandings and misinterpretations that they placed on agreements at the time. And then the lender is the faulty one. In the end its still me that is massively worse off, but I dont expect the attitude to change, especially when the 'brains' concerned are so emo, and so badly misdirected. Sad and pathetic but thats how some of us are. It's surprising how it took two years for me to pay off the money i borrowed and loaned you to get you out of trouble, and yet I'm the one in the wrong. Well the records still exist as the tax laws required them to be for 10 years. It might be much more ueful to you to consider why you might have twisted your reality to give yourself something emo to hold on to for a decade, that would be a very productive outcome from this series of events. mozasaur (talk) 16:20, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

This is clearly an inappropriate space to discuss such matters, but as there is no other agreed to, here we are. I have much more to say, when i get time and inclination to fill in the objective details, that are completely at odds with the alleged belief.mozasaur (talk) 02:49, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics!

Paul Moss is a con artist and the people he has stolen from remember this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.56.247.143 (talk) 14:37, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

sigh. if that had any truth in it at all the editor would front up with a name and contact details. I am beginning to get used to the hate mail and hating behaviour. it says a lot about the society we live in. I also know of some other people with the same name as me, and I get their hate mail too!! mistaken identities are more common these days. wisdom says that people often speak about stuff that they do themselves, that's why they think of the subjects, and this form of hate is conning the naive and stealing of respect of good people... I say put your money where your mouth is, and front up with honesty and 'believability', ie show some credibilty with identification and track record..

and just for interest, when i study the log, this 'person' (moron) is wierd, here is a comment from below;

QUESTION: "Hi Paul, Why do you call your little club sidewalk astronomers ? I am from New Zealand and this is the first time that I have seen the term Sidewalk used as in New Zealand we tend to say Footpath ? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sidewalk#Other_Countries .

Answer. Sidewalk Astronomers is a Global Organisation based in USA and started by John Dobson decades ago. I am the Regional (Oceania) and National (NZ) Organiser for this international organisation, an affiliation of clubs, societies, organisations, groups. In fact, here in NZ, its not my club, its not even a club, it's a loose association of like minded individuals that place giving their time and resource (telescopes) to the community above selfishly spending it alone. It is fully global, check this link for all National Organisers.ref: Global N.O. list and this link for all the Regional Organisers: Global list of all R.O.

My astro group that is closest to a 'club' is called 'Sharing Space' .. Sharing Space and its fully global, with thousands of members, all voluntary. The facebook group has 578 members currently, about the same number as the top two astro societies in NZ, at 600 approx each. ref http://www.facebook.com/mozasaur?ref=profile#!/group.php?gid=7594579183&ref=ts

Question. why do some morons want to hate so much in the face of achievement? lack of regular lithium? failed relationships? lack of media attention? most would say jealousy, and I have to admit incredible success with media and awards, achievements, living my dreams, doing what i love to do. Perhaps the 9 to 5 grind is too much and some people don't know how to get out of the rat race?

Back to more serious stuff

-talk prior to July 2007 archived here [2]

-talk July 2007 to April 2009 archived here: [3]

Radio New Zealand 101 Radio frequencies nationally - yes significantly thats ALL of NEW ZEALAND

Radio New Zealand National's programming is distributed via several means.

[edit] AM Frequencies [edit] North Island Kaitaia - AM 837 Kaikohe - AM 981 Whangarei - AM 837 Auckland - AM 756 Hamilton - AM 1143 Tauranga - AM 819 Tokoroa - AM 729 Rotorua - AM 1188 Gisborne - AM 1314 Napier - AM 630 New Plymouth - AM 918 Wanganui - AM 567 Palmerston North - AM 1449 Masterton - AM 1071 Kapiti - AM 567 Wellington - AM 567 [edit] South Island Blenheim - AM 567 Nelson - AM 1116 Westport - AM 1458 Christchurch - AM 675 Timaru - AM 918 Queenstown - AM 1134 Alexandra - AM 639 Dunedin - AM 810 Invercargill - AM 720 [edit] FM Frequencies

Radio New Zealand National is the first station in New Zealand to incorporate the Radio Data System in its FM signal. Some FM stations are 101FM state-owned public service frequencies and some are owned by non-profit community organisations.

[edit] North Island Kaitaia - FM 101.2 Kaikohe - FM 101.6 Whangarei - FM 101.1 and 104.3 Auckland - FM 101.4 Hamilton - FM 101.0 Tauranga - FM 101.0 Whakatane - FM 101.7 Tokoroa - FM 101.0 Rotorua - FM 101.5 Te Kuiti - FM 94.0 (Community owned) Taupo - FM 101.5 Taupo - FM 104.7 Gisborne - FM 101.3 Napier - 101.5 FM New Plymouth - 101.2 FM Wanganui - FM 101.6 Palmerston North - FM 101.0 Masterton - FM 101.5 Kapiti - 101.5 FM Wellington - FM 101.3, 104.5 [edit] South Island Blenheim - FM 101.7 Takaka - FM 98.2 (Community owned) Nelson - 101.0 FM Greymouth - FM 101.5 Christchurch - FM 101.7 Ashburton - FM 101.4 Lake Tekapo - FM 89.0 (Community owned) Twizel - FM 92.6(Community owned) Omarama - FM 97.3 (Community owned) Otematata - FM 106.7(Community owned) Timaru - 101.1 FM Wanaka - FM 101.0 Milford Sound - FM 92.0 (Community owned) Queenstown - FM 101.6 Alexandra - FM 101.5 Te Anau - FM 101.6 (Community owned) Dunedin - FM 101.4 Invercargill - FM 101.2 [edit] Other islands Chatham Islands - FM 89.7 (Community)

Icon Group International

You state on your userpage that: "I am reported in a book as an Astronomer on PAGE 409 [23] Title Wellington: Webster’s Quotations, Facts and Phrases [etc.]". Unfortunately, these books by Icon Group International are computer-generated, with most of the text copied from Wikipedia (most entries have [WP] by them to indicate this, see e.g. [4]). Despite giving an appearance of reliability, the name "Webster's" has been public domain since the late 19th century. Another publisher to be wary of as they reuse Wikipedia articles is Alphascript Publishing. Fences&Windows 17:36, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

sure is a lot of bs online.. but its only a teeny piece of the reality/unreality pie..

a further thought, why does this piece of nothingness (the false book ref) invoke such energy, when the actual reality of everything else on that page is so much more relevant and important to my public life? Its just a point of view for discussion. I get that it's easier, perhaps just search wikipedia for such uses of those simulated books, and kill them. and I agree with that too. But I also see significantly more value in catching people getting it right; positive support and progression will always generate more work and better outcomes, than the equivalent of the medieval inquisitions, that just breed fear and disenchantment, lowering productivity.

MfD nomination of User:Paul Moss/Captain PJs Disco

User:Paul Moss/Captain PJs Disco, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Paul Moss/Captain PJs Disco and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Paul Moss/Captain PJs Disco during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. duffbeerforme (talk) 05:36, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

stupid fucker. it is not an ad, its an historic record of a notable business and creative enterprise, but you clearly no nothing about reality. it is so called 'wikipedians' with your stupidity and irrelevance that makes this place increasingly irrelevant to mainstream... go and do something constructive ffs.mozasaur (talk) 15:59, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

the page is clearly not an ad, there is a carbon copy here for anyone to make up their own mind. It supposed to be consensus you dumbeee... It hasnt operated since early 1980 so how can it be an ad. you probably cant count either so hey, its 30 years. THIRTY YEARS. oh a Dr Who ad.... but you wont even get that joke. in fact you dont even know what a joke is. http://www.gadot.wellington.net.nz/musicgen/CaptainPJ.htm. We played more than 50,000 records to thousands of people for 7 years and you have deleted how many characters? slight unbalance here between giving and taking but you wont see that either. in fact i dont care that much anyway, i gave that up a while back, after all its me thats off to my international exhibition on the OTHER side of the planet, not you, i moved on from this space, you are still stuck here. lol.

lol

doesn't this just illustrate ever so clearly that consensus simply doesnt exist here???

Copyright problem: Tapu Te Ranga Marae

Hi, I was reviewing your edits in 2006 to Tapu Te Ranga Marae under User:Mozasaur, and found text copied or closely paraphrased from http://www.taputeranga.maori.nz/, which is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Tapu Te Ranga Marae and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Tapu Te Ranga Marae, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Tapu Te Ranga Marae with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Tapu Te Ranga Marae. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Tapu Te Ranga Marae saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you and let me know if any of this is unclear. Dcoetzee 06:24, 6 July 2012 (UTC)