Jump to content

User talk:Kristuq

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Kristuq (talk | contribs) at 15:08, 23 April 2015 (→‎April 2015). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


April 2015

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  KrakatoaKatie 10:42, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

can you please tell my why I was blocked. This is a company and there is no promotional information on it. It simply states the history of the company? Please explain? I have worked so hard for all of this and here you come and simply block me because you think I am advertising ???!?!

You've worked hard? You wrote one paragraph and then you pasted in the contents of this page and this page. And you did that at the same time that you provided the edit summary "Addition of text with no copyrighted text" at the time that you recreated the page. —Largo Plazo (talk) 11:45, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Also, stop creating new accounts, like you did at User:Wikifakes1996- this is sockpuppetry, and all the accounts will get blocked very quickly. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:27, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ok look I am new to this. I thought that by adding the reference you could place text into the page. Sorry for this. I simply wanted to make two pages for two companies that I know. Is it possible that I can get unblocked. I was just asking that you don't delete the whole page simply leave the live which was not copyrighted. Kristuq (talk) 13:55, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to be unblocked, first read the guidelines at WP:GAB. Then, you need to use {{unblock | reason=your reason here ~~~~}}, putting your reason where it currently says "your reason here". Joseph2302 (talk) 13:57, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I have simply one question, why did you not delete the text and leave the few lines which I wrote myself? Because simply deleting the whole page does no good, if you would of left the page, maybe others could of written their part? Kristuq (talk) 14:10, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, and so if copyrighted material is added, then it must be deleted as soon as possible. Also, 90-95% of the information on there was copyrighted, so without it, the article would have been almost nothing. Also, it wasn't actually me who deleted the pages. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:15, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kristuq (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

In wikipedia terms I am just one day old. So I was pretty much learning as I would find out new features. It is not easy for a newcomer to get used to this complex behind the scenes part. Therefore I asked to be unblocked because I was aware of the conditions and the guidelines. I thought it was ok to simply post text as long as I referenced it. Now I know that I will have to write everything myself in order for it to be published here. My main concern was that some of the text was written by me even if it was minatory, so why does the whole page have to be deleted However I do understand the rules and regulations and I will not break them. From now on I will probably ask of anything I don't know so that I don't get blocked, because like most people I do want to help, and I am sorry for the mess that I caused. I simply know of companies and I think they should be up on this page so that people have an easier time when reading about them. This I know because I had to write a paper on them and it was quite difficult to find information. Thank you! Kristuq (talk) 14:07, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

(1) You're not going to be unblocked if you intend to try to recreate an advertisement about a non-notable company and (2) regarding your comment below, see WP:BROTHER Did you even read what I have written? I said I will do it correctly this time, that means I am not going to place copyrighted information!!!!! That means that I will also not advertise something!!!!! I am simply going to write about the company, and of course it is notable company if it has a revenue over 1 billion dollars -.-. Just because you don't know about it doesn't mean it's non-notable. Even Financial Time has written about the owner and its history!!!! . OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:59, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have a question. After being blocked, did you create the account User:Wikifakes1996? This user was making very similar edits of you, and using multiple accounts is forbidden, see WP:SOCKPUPPET. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:15, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Again I understood the problem with copyrighted, I will not do that again. When I create it again I will make sure not to do the same mistakes. Now regarding that other guy Wikifakes1996, that is my brother. And there is no surprise that he would back me up or recreate what I wanted to create at first, additionally I don't see how he broke the rules. Kristuq (talk) 14

I have a concern with what you just wrote: "... that other guy Wikifakes1996, that is my brother." On User talk:Callanecc, your "brother" wrote "Please stop deleting my infomation pages for nothing because if I wanted to make a ad it would be talking about the services which this comapny offers. Something which I am not doing. Please return the page because I spent a lot of time building!!" [emphasis added]. Is your brother in the habit of referring to you as "I"? —Largo Plazo (talk) 14:55, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
"I didn't do it, my brother/sister/friend did it" is a standard argument that fails here. I guess we'll find out when Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kristuq is involved- I would strongly recommend that no admin unblocks this user until that SPI is resolved. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:58, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

First of all my brother did contribute as he did add the references to the information page as well as aided me with information about the company and its owners. Secondly, as I was blocked, I was not able to edit the page, so I had emailed him what to write so that someone could read it and understand that they should not delete the enter page just the 80% which was copyrighted. So it was in my words not his but he was the one able to write it as he was not blocked......!!!! Kristuq (talk) 15:08, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]