Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Emu
Appearance
A big Australian bird, text rewritten and fact-checked by me, copyedited by Tony1 and some helpful anons. I should add that imperial conversions are provided in the body of the text, but were mostly left out of the lead for the sake of brevity and clarity.--Peta 04:45, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- Support. Excellent. Well-written, well-referenced, and a fascinating read. SlimVirgin (talk) 04:53, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- Oh, and great photographs, especially the three toes. :-) SlimVirgin (talk) 04:54, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- Support brilliantly written, excellently sourced article for a curious critter.--cj | talk 05:42, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- Support excellent prose, beautiful presentation of the subject. Gnangarra 05:50, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- Support 'for sake of brevity and clarity' is important and to be noted. Well done what is needed is in there. SatuSuro 05:53, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- Support Exceptionally written (short and sharp) and very interesting. Excellent work. michael talk 06:17, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- Support. The baby emu picture has a deprecated image tag, though. Jeronimo 06:45, 27 July 2006 (UTC)