Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sonic2030
Sonic2030
- Sonic2030 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Populated account categories: confirmed
13 May 2015
– This SPI case is open.
- Suspected sockpuppets
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
@DoRD: There's no doubt that it is Sonic2030, same same edits on John Coleman (news weathercaster), [1] like previous socks[2][3], this IP looks so similar to 72.196.235.154 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) and 72.196.235.207 (talk · contribs · WHOIS)who also edited this article.[4][5]. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 17:00, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- @Bgwhite: You removed my comment and restored sock. There is no consensus for those irrelevant edits, you were there to WP:WIKIHOUND. IPs don't need to be confirmed, they can be just dealt per WP:DENY since they have same characteristics like previous socks. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 21:37, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- You never edited this page ever before,[6] you went there by my contribution history in order to favor a sock because that is your only aim. These IPs are socks, DoRD can confirm too, since he had blocked this IP on Coleman as a sock already.(block log) We don't connect IPs with the account but still act due to the same characteristics.[7][8] Thus your claim "not confirmed" is frivolous. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 22:00, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- No? If you had any different aim, then why you misrepresented the actual event that the IP was blocked as a sock already? You claimed that it was never blocked. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 22:53, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- You never edited this page ever before,[6] you went there by my contribution history in order to favor a sock because that is your only aim. These IPs are socks, DoRD can confirm too, since he had blocked this IP on Coleman as a sock already.(block log) We don't connect IPs with the account but still act due to the same characteristics.[7][8] Thus your claim "not confirmed" is frivolous. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 22:00, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
The IP in question reverted edits by another IP. The "another" IP reverted my edits. The edits were agreed to on Talk:John Coleman (news weathercaster). Also, OcultZone, removing the talk page discussions because they are a "confirmed sock".[9] and reverting edits made to the article because "rv sock of sonic2030" is not called for. It has not been confirmed. None of the other IPs you gave were blocked. OccultZone removed an edit agreed to on the talk page. Bgwhite (talk) 20:19, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- The page is on my watchlist as I've edited there very recently. You revert the edit to the article which I took responsibility for. WP:DENY is an essay, it never says to revert socks. Again, an IP reverted my edit. 72.196.233.185 reverted the IPs. It was not doing vandalism and restoring an edit agreed to on the talk page. Bgwhite (talk) 21:52, 13 May 2015 (UTC)