Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indie Vision Music

Indie Vision Music

Indie Vision Music (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

insufficient sources to establish notability; article has been tagged for notability for two years. A few mentions for reviews but only article I found about the site was this one asking for donations. —Мандичка^YO 😜 12:16, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

• Strong Delete - all references on page are self referential. No notable mentions on Google or Google News. Does not meet notability standard. CerealKillerYum (talk) 13:00, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:46, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:46, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:46, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

• Delete There are plenty of excerpts taken from reviews given in other reliable sources, but that just merely indicates that Indie Vision Music is reliable. I can find no sources that discuss the site/record label itself, thus indicating that it is not notable.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 18:18, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

• Strong Keep Article seems to be in poor shape, but as someone who is tied to this branch of the music industry, I will note that IVM is most certainly notable within the field. It is one of the major players when it comes to Christian Music news/reviews. Frankly, I'm surprised that this is even being discussed, lest for the random "Deletion Nazis" floating around. —Maktesh ^(talk) 21:58, 19 May 2015 (UTC)