User talk:Cyberia3

File:Alfred Drayton.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:Alfred Drayton.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 16:52, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have given all necessary and possible information about this image (and others) from a 75 year old Film star magazine from a long defunct title. It had photos and very short biographies. No other information. Even the bots on this site are wreckers.(Cyberia3 (talk) 18:26, 3 June 2013 (UTC))[reply]

June 2013

Please stop using talk pages such as Talk:Unite Against Fascism for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article; not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. — Richard BB 10:03, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Cyberia3. You have new messages at Richard BB's talk page.
Message added 10:56, 24 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

— Richard BB 10:56, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sources...again

I see that you have decided to return to editing. As has been explained and requested of you before please ensure you include reliable sources when adding content to articles. The additions you made to June Whitfield were not supported by citations and appear to be your own knowledge/research. These basic policies have not changed in the one year break you took from editing. --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 17:28, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I gave up before because of the sheer vandalism of the moderator wreckers here who seem to hate the wikipedia. In the article I added to, I gave the title of the BBC radio programme I used for the information, which came from June Whitfield's own mouth. But you have removed it all proving once again that you are a wrecker.

"These basic policies have not changed in the one year break you took from editing." You mean you are still wrecking articles? I can see that for myself. I do not need a wrecker to boast about it.

Maybe you should stick to Japanese cartoons?(Cyberia3 (talk) 15:51, 25 June 2013 (UTC))[reply]

"I saw it on a radio program" is original research. It would certainly be helpful if you would actually read the links that have been provided to you repeatedly so that you could start to understand why you keep having the same issues regarding your edits being reverted. There are no "moderator wreckers", just admins who are vetted and trusted by the editing community to uphold the policies and guidelines that have been determined by consensus. If you do not agree with the community's consensus then start a discussion on the relevant policy or guidelines page to see if there is support to change it. Ignoring the requirements for editing here won't bring about the changes you desire and will ultimately lead to your account being blocked.--Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 19:46, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I HEARD Molly Weir, actress and writer talking on an episode of "It's a funny business" yesterday but did not bother adding to her page to save you wrecking it and the reference I gave as you did with June Whitfield. My account being blocked? I can add as a guest or even start a new account. The hard disk is ready to fail on this laptop so taking an IP address would be almost as useless as your moderating, fish girl.(Cyberia3 (talk) 07:01, 26 June 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Cyberia3. You have new messages at Richard BB's talk page.
Message added 15:59, 25 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

— Richard BB 15:59, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:Hope not Hate, you may be blocked from editing. — Richard BB 16:41, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You mean I should just let you and other moderators wreck my work and say nothing about it. Sorry God for daring to question your infalibility (Cyberia3 (talk) 06:57, 26 June 2013 (UTC))[reply]

As I've explained countless times, you should use the talk page of an article to discuss changes to the article itself, not to discuss its subject as you did at Hope not Hate. — Richard BB 07:31, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Hope not Hate, you may be blocked from editing. — Richard BB 13:09, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Hope not Hate, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Richard BB 15:03, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop readding the material about the EDL member's suicide to the article. It is not notable, it is unsourced, and it clearly pushing a very pro-EDL and anti-HNH viewpoint. It isn't appropriate for Wikipedia. If you continue I'll have no choice but to take this to WP:AN/I. — Richard BB 15:07, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It was never ignored. About four other editors all addressed your points and proved that your claims are baseless, and yet you are the one ignoring the discussion. — Richard BB 17:00, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I am not a fan of the hate group, HNH as you obviously are as you use your position to push your own agenda here.(Cyberia3 (talk) 19:06, 2 June 2015 (UTC))[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Clive Brook.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Clive Brook.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:04, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Frisco Jenny.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Frisco Jenny.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:27, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:John Mack Brown.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:John Mack Brown.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:51, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Phantom of the West.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Phantom of the West.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:57, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Miracle Man.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Miracle Man.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:51, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]