User talk:Randykitty

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32, 33, 34

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by .

I am very busy in real life and will be available only occasionally until things calm down.

Hi, and welcome to my User Talk page! For new discussions, please add your comments at the very bottom and use a section heading (e.g., by using the "+" tab, or, depending on your settings, the "new section" tab at the top of this page). I will respond on this page unless specifically requested otherwise. I dislike talk-back templates and fragmented discussions. If I post on your page you may assume that I will watch it for a response. If you post here I will assume the same (and that you lost interest if you stop following the discussion).

IF YOU CAME HERE BECAUSE I DELETED AN ARTICLE: Please see WP:REFUND first. Thanks.

Wikipedia is no place for humour.
Everything is very serious here and we are all terrifically important.

Category:Science books

You might wish to weigh in here -- hopefully not in opposition: Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 June 24#Category:Science books. Thanks. Fgnievinski (talk) 18:02, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done and supported (but with some critical notes :-) --Randykitty (talk) 18:13, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tax Analysts

Hi there. I see you deleted Tax Analysts some time last year. If I recall correctly, the page used to have a fair amount of useful material, though I'm not sure what it looked like when you got to it.

Would you mind sending it to my userspace so I can see what can be salvaged? Thanks. — Bdb484 (talk) 19:34, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Answered on your talk. --Randykitty (talk) 17:49, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In re that Mexican Sociology journal

It's not a well written article, but it seems as if it's a real academic journal. I've slightly modified my motion on the AfD to "delete" or "userfy." Perhaps the author or one of its patrons could work on it and make sure it passes before moving it into article space. Just thought I'd alert you to see if it sounds like a good resolution to you, too. One wonders, by the way, if there is an article on the journal in the Spanish language wiki and why .en would require an article before it does. Oh, well. One wonders many things, including why one's students always "wander" why one marks their writing errors. Hithladaeus (talk) 17:12, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Initialisms

Re European Intellectual Property Review. It was niggling at me, and my curiosity got the better of me....what's the reason to remove initialisms? Widefox; talk 09:01, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Initialisms are useful if a long expression is used repeatedly in an article. In the present case, however, I really don't see any use for it. The only people who might not be able to figure out the initialism for themselves would be illiterate people, not really our readership, I think. --Randykitty (talk) 09:07, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much...

...for your kind words of support over at my RfA. I hope that your trust in me will not prove to have been misplaced. :-) --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 00:57, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of my page

You deleted my page "Maurice Carpenter" on May 19th and I wanted to see what I needed to do to have it reinstated. I am unsure why it was even deleted. Thanks!! Luckyleftyllc (talk) 17:28, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]