Jump to content

User talk:Knoper

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Dekk01 (talk | contribs) at 20:28, 20 July 2015 (Disambiguation link notification for March 25). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to History of the St. Louis Rams may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • [[Charlotte]] to win an expansion team, St. Louis lost to a group from [[Jacksonville, Florida]]. (So certain, in fact, did it appear that St. Louis would gain an expansion franchise, that the team

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:15, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Canadian Football League in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fred Smith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Quebec referendum, 1995, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Union Nationale and Reform Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pierre Trudeau, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Donald Macdonald. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pierre Trudeau, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages CTV, Constitutional convention and David Lewis. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:56, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Supply management

Hi. Thanks for your praise, and thanks to you too for your edits to Supply management! I appreciate your extensive editing and having a fresh set of eyes look at it, and in a great many places you improved my language, logic, or tone. I did undo or partially undo a handful of changes where I thought it best, but in every case I'm open to change or discussion. Cheers, Oreo Priest talk 15:45, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Quebec referendum, 1995, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Rae. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Canada Act 1982, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Constitutional convention. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Quebec referendum, 1995 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • riding.<ref name=Chomedey /> A study released months after the referendum by [McGill University]] sociologist Maurice Pinard, statistician Janusz Kaczorowski and lawyer Andrew Orkin, concluded

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:47, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Pierre Trudeau may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:03, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Quebec referendum, 1995, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bombardier. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Quebec referendum, 1980, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Union Nationale and Claude Morin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Quebec referendum, 1995, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gaspé (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 4 February

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Referendum

My pleasure. I vaguely remembered the incident, but didn't have a source for it until I decided to actually tackle starting an article about Joyce Napier yesterday.

I am admittedly a little concerned that for the moment, it's being presented as sort of an isolated incident, where in reality there were some other significant media relations bungles, on both sides of the campaign, beyond just that one alone — going into a bit more depth about the tactical errors and backtracks on both sides, I think, would help significantly.

You're absolutely right about the decline of the community of interest on the topic, but I'm finding that to be a phenomenon right across the board for Wikipedia as a whole these days — there seem to be far less people around in 2015 than there used to be, and both maintenance and content projects are really suffering for it. (Just as an example, I find that when I initiate an AFD or CFD discussion now, it routinely has to get relisted for another week at least once, and sometimes twice, not because of actual debate or disagreement but for lack of anybody even participating in the discussion at all.) I'm a lot more worried about the longterm viability of Wikipedia now than I used to be, frankly. Bearcat (talk) 19:56, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed Re backtracks, I intend to add quite a few more. Knoper (talk) 20:03, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Progressive Conservative leadership election, 1983, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Union Nationale (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]