Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moxkito (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Quincy Adomarko (talk | contribs) at 08:53, 1 August 2015. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Moxkito (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional. →Enock4seth (talk) 16:32, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:34, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:34, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 Talk 14:46, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:33, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Article is not written neutrally and reliable sources does not significantly cover the subject.--JAaron95 Talk 16:20, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I didn't really get it when enock went like its not catchy. This topic has been solved so am wondering why enock nominated it again. Lets focus on other articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.215.169.16 (talk) 08:46, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Over 36 references not being enough and catchy is arguable. Feel the hustle of the young kid and what he built. I think enough reference has been cited and with time more will be added. I vote for keep rather than to delete