User talk:No names left!! abcd

After trying about 30 names, I am pooped. Most of the names rejected were claimed to be similar to existing names but not really. Some names that I tried were judged to be promotional but from it. One was Bongo Drums but that is not promotional.

Username change

If you would like to have your username changed to "Bongo Drums", you can make a request at the username change page. Conifer (talk) 06:33, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of airports in the Vatican

The article List of airports in the Vatican has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

If there are no items on the list, as is the case here, we don't need a page on that list.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Everymorning (talk) 20:15, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Complaints, you may be blocked from editing. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 17:32, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of airports in the Vatican for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of airports in the Vatican is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of airports in the Vatican until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 17:35, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Death and state funeral of Jimmy Carter listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Death and state funeral of Jimmy Carter. Since you had some involvement with the Death and state funeral of Jimmy Carter redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 19:36, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at User:No names left!! abcd, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. It's not appropriate nor constructive for you to create a userspace that is a total copy and paste of another Wikipedian - especially if that copy and paste contains badges that show permissions you don't possess. Including adminsitrator badges. Please stop.Template:Z45 -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 19:49, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is not disruptive. I left a disclaimer saying I was working on the page. I was going to go through and remove the boxes that I didn't want, such as the ones you object. Please improve wikipedia by starting a page with all the boxes so people can see it in one place and choose. No names left!! abcd (talk) 21:02, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is quite disruptive. You have top-icons on your user page that indicate you have permissions (including an administrator top icon) you do not have. Start small, don't copy and paste a page so involved with graphics, and especially do not copy and paste the page of an administrator. Above all, stop editing disruptively. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 21:24, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Do not perform edits that only administrators are to perform. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 21:22, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

STOP HARASSING ME. I DID NOT VANDALIZE. YOU FALSELY ACCUSE ME. IF you are not a vandal, you would edit nicely, like I am adding facts, not harrass people. Please go away. No names left!! abcd (talk) 21:24, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:Winkelvi. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Warning is in regard to this edit. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 18:22, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not an attack. And Winkevi is you so you are threatening to block because you don't like a good suggestion to you. Not good.

I have removed content from your user page, such as topicons denoting permissions that you do not have on Wikipedia, projects that you are not a member of, links to articles created pages you did not create, etc. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:16, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Northamerica. As noted on that page, I did state that there are wrong user boxes and that it was a work in progress. I was slowly working on removing things that I didn't want but when you edit, the pictures and boxes are replaced by words and codes, making it much harder to decipher. Thank you for helping out. There are some others that I want to remove but will work on that in the near future. As far as articles that I didn't create, I did turn back the "article's created" to zero (but you removed that, too) No names left!! abcd (talk) 22:55, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]