User talk:Sulfurboy
| This is Sulfurboy's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28Auto-archiving period: 3 days  |
I again will be working almost the entire weekend and will probably not be available till Monday. Please be patient in my responses. If it is an immediate issue please seek out an admin. If you have an AfC page that you think is ready again, just go ahead and re-submit it so another editor can see it. Thanks.
- See an issue needing an answer on my talk page that you could help with? Feel free to answer!
I will absolutely not respond to your comment unless you follow the following simple rules in placing a comment on my talk page.
- 1)You have read my FAQ below and haven't asked a question answered by it.
- 2)Appropriately post a new section (see button/link above) at the BOTTOM of the page
- 3)Do not ask me to just generically fix your page without a specific question, I'm not interested in fixing everyone's page for them.
- 4)You need to hyperlink to the page you are discussing, this is probably most important. If it's remotely difficult for me to figure out what page you're talking about, I'm not going to waste my time.
Sorry if those four things seem harsh, but I review and patrol hundreds of pages a day and can't keep up with all the replies.
FAQ You declined a page I submitted for AfC and have a question... If that question is directly answered by one of the hyperlinks posted after I reviewed it, I will not answer you. You'd be surprised how often it happens. The posted links are posted for a reason!
Why did you not leave a comment when you tagged my page? I typically won't unless I think the issue may be unclear. New page patrol is overwhelmed (~50,000 pages to be reviewed with only ~1000 being currently reviewed every week) and if I spent the time to explain every tag, I wouldn't be able to review even a third of the pages I do now.
I completely disagree with a tag you placed on my page!! If you disagree with a tag, please state why on the article's talk page and leave a note here for me to review it. If you think the tag was a blatant error on my part (it happens, sorry), then please revert the edit and leave me a message letting me know that was the case.
I don't see a conversation or message I posted on your talk page... Check the archives, conversations are typically automatically archived after five days. If you wish to comment on an archived section, please move it back to the main page. I do not regularly monitor my archive pages.
Why do you keep tagging my page? Do you have something against me? No. Occasionally after you address certain issues, more issues will arise on my re-review. For example, let's say I first tagged your page for having no references, after you add references I may go back and add a tag for no in-line citations (which would have been irrelevant before there were references). Also, if there are multiple, small issues with your page and I can see you're new, I might just tag a few things at a time instead of overwhelming a new user. Please do not take any of my tags personally. I do not target people. I go straight down the list on the new page patrol. I do however regularly watch pages I review, which is why you might see me come up often in edits on your page.
Will you help me fix issues you tagged on my page? Typically not, unless I need a break from new page patrol. Why? I used to do this and it got to be very overwhelming. I feel the actual new page patrol needs my help more than helping to fix things on already existing pages (not to mention there's others much more qualified than me for most fixes suchs as categories, copyediting, etc). It doesn't hurt to ask though, but please do not be offended if I do not help or don't respond. The tea house is your friend, use it. Note: I will always clarify on tags, though. All in all,don't hope the house will build itself!
I would like to give you an award, thank you note, or barnstar... Thanks! You're awesome. And I always love the support. But please put it on my user page, not my talk page. :)
Draft:Electric motor efficiency submission declined on 11th of August 2015 by user sulfurboy
Hi Sulfurboy, my trial to submit the article electric motor efficiency was declined several times, the reason for this have been quit different, this is most frustrating because I'm an new user. This time the reason for declining this article are titled: "wrong reference" I used the reference to the web site of BAM, which is the german "Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung", ministerial office for material research! the other reference refers to the European office for Low voltage switchgear, which is busy for the low voltage Industrie. both of them are highly official offices in European standardization, which I'm working for. my request is to accept this draft of article, it would be glad to leave a message at my talk page. thanks regards brennige (talk) 15:00, 12 August 2015
Ganz Danubius Article re-submission
Dear Sulfurboy, The Ganz Danubius Article submission was declined on the 7 July 2015 referring that the submission read more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. I have edited, saved and submitted the Article to suit your request in encyclopedic manner. Please be so kind to review. This article is very important because Ganz Danubius once belonged to the Ganz Works (already exisiting wikipedia article) but Ganz Danubius should exist as an individual article because Ganz Works did not exist as a registered entity. Ganz Danubius has a significant historical role in the development of Hungarian shipbuilding traditions dated back to 1835. I am trying to establish this article on wikipedia to at least mention and highlight the 159 years of successful shipbuilding in Hungary. Kind regards, Eng. Endre Szabo (75.yo), the last technical director of Ganz Danubius until 1994 Ganz Danubius Ganz Danubius (talk) 12:13, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ganz Danubius (talk • contribs) 12:11, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Just submitted a new article....Pomiferin. Will you be the editor?
Bhc2004, 23 August '15 Bhc2004 (talk) 11:23, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
I resubmitted this article to AfC after you declined the first draft (making the necessary corrections, of course). However, it's been over a week, and I have a feeling that an article that was already declined isn't at the top of the list. Just to expedite things, can you take a look at it and see if it's ready for the mainspace?--Invisiboy42293 (talk) 00:48, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Draft:Symbio_Networks - Help please
Hi there,
I would really like to get the Symbio draft submitted. I believe I have now ground this down to it's bare factual bones as such am at a loss at which points are deemed to be promotional.
Please Let me know so I can delete or adjust these parts accordingly, as mentioned, I would love to get this finally submitted.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Symbio_Networks
Thanks,
Lauren
06:27:20, 25 August 2015 review of submission by RKUV
RKUV (talk) 06:27, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello, the prestigious Guldbaggen award (re "notability") is included at the beginning too, discography links to Bärjed's major bands like The Soundtrack Of Our Lives, certainly well-known. Is there something crucial missing that keeps the article from being an "official stub" up on the 'net so other Bärjed/TSOOL fans etc can improve further upon it? Best regards, RKUV (talk) 06:27, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The New Page Patroller's Barnstar | |
| 3,887 patrolls in the last 12 months! Well done! Keep up the good work.. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:59, 25 August 2015 (UTC) |
23:28:07, 25 August 2015 review of submission by Gorgenkor
I've revised the article, adding section headings as recommended, and more background information. Also edited it for a more neutral tone, for example replacing "celebrated" with "recognized", etc, and resubmitted for a new review. Thanks!
Gorgenkor (talk) 23:28, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
06:03:03, 26 August 2015 review of submission by 121.6.9.186
- 121.6.9.186 (talk · contribs)
Hi, this is the first time we've tried making a Wikipedia article and have failed twice. We'd like to understand and get help on making a legit and reliable article.
I'm the Producer of Selfie the movie, and would like to understand how we can possibly cite / reference or write in a way that would make the article notable and be able to publish it.
Some examples would greatly help too.
Thank you very much for your guidance.