Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian Drapeau

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by New Media Theorist (talk | contribs) at 03:56, 27 September 2015 (Christian Drapeau: weak keep). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Christian Drapeau (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Author/academic with no apparent claim of notability. Tagged for notability since early 2010 without improvement, no better sources found. Article creator shares a name with the publishing house of a couple of subject's books. --Finngall talk 18:51, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:27, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:27, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep, Enough news sources cover him in both a positive and negative light that I think he's... just barely deserving. Note that in the Huffpost article by Raymond L. Flynn, Flynn is noted as an advisor to Drapeau's company, while in other articles like this one in the Boston Herald, he is not. This article appears in the Le Devoir, although it is a bit promotional in tone. Perhaps more interesting in terms of balance are articles like this one calling his work a "load of bollocks". I think it would be good for there to be a balanced source on his notable yet controversial 'work', rather than no source at all.New Media Theorist (talk) 03:56, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]