This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
Not sure what you mean? See Category:Family trees for the many precedents. So yes, I thought so. Especially when so many ancestors are independently notable. In this case there already was a Crowninshield family article. The general rule for a person having their own article is that being related to notable people is not enough to make them notable. But if there are other reasons they deserve an article, then any information given in reliable sources about them can be included. Even if you do not like it. In fact, the old paper encyclopedias of the past often spent much more time on ancestry that current celebrity status. If you want to change wikipedia conventions for biographies, this can be discussed at, say, Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (biographies). W Nowicki (talk) 20:06, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I believe this article qualifies for deletion as subject is not notable, article reads like a puff piece and appears to be largely edited by the subject i.e. Qbradlee and Qbradlee82. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.30.55.17 (talk) 01:49, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Suggest removing autobiography warning
While earlier versions of this article might have been autobiographical, the current references, citations and valid secondary-source links appear to substantiate a neutral POV about the subject of the article. As such, I suggest removing the autobiography warning.2001:558:6008:3B:1D26:437E:145B:7EA3 (talk) 00:26, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
