Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights
 | This article, Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights, has recently been created via the Articles for creation process. Please check to see if the reviewer has accidentally left this template after accepting the draft and take appropriate action as necessary.
Reviewer tools: Inform author |
| This article, Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights, has recently been created via the Articles for creation process. Please check to see if the reviewer has accidentally left this template after accepting the draft and take appropriate action as necessary.
Reviewer tools: Inform author |
Comment: This needs some writing for clarity. You don't really state what VP is, since in one section you refer to it as if it was a book, in another like it's a company, and in another like it's a guideline. Also, while you say that these are used with governments you don't entirely make it clear if this is something that is an official part of the government. This also sometimes reads a little like a personal essay or a pro-VP article, but not to the point where it's a huge-huge issue.You need to be able to provide context so the average reader can know what exactly it is that you're talking about here. This also needs some non-primary sourcing since many of these appear to be by governments and organizations that use them or work closely with the group. This can make it likely that the organization will be notable, but it's not always a guarantee. A search heavily suggests that this is notable, so mostly you just need to add in some sources in places like academic texts just to show that it's not just people talking about themselves/the organization. Stuff like this would work well since it's by a very well known academic publisher. Here are some more, so if you can work these into the article that should be enough: [1], [2]. Basically this decline is just because the article needs more context and explanation. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:33, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: This appears notable, gauging from the available print sources. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 18:56, 12 October 2015 (UTC)