Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Droideka

Droideka

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'd speedy this as non-notable but odds are that the tag would be removed because there is a Rizla Blue-thin assertion of notability. TheLongTone (talk) 15:17, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Rizla Blue-thin assertion of notability.--2.121.186.75 (talk) 19:55, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:15, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:15, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep References seem legit. That said, I think it's highly questionable to make this artist the default page for the term. I note that the move was made recently and that should probably be reverted. Chunky Rice (talk) 19:09, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:13, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Exuse can this debate please continue the person who requested this article for deletion hasn't added any input. In my eyes I would Keep this article.