User talk:C.Fred

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by .

Welcome to my talk page!

Please sign and date your comment (by adding ~~~~ at the end) to assist the bot that archives this page.
Please add a new thread to the bottom of the page if you wish to leave me a new message. If you're following up on a previous message, keep your comment in that same place:
- If you leave me a message here, I will reply here and {{Mention}} you here or leave a {{Talkback}} template on your talk page, unless you indicate that you are watching my page or no talkback message is necessary.
- If you are responding to a message I left on your talk page, please reply there so the discussion stays in one place. Please {{Mention}} me in the message there or leave a {{Talkback}} template here so I know about the message, unless I indicate that no talkback is necessary in my message. If you are commenting here on a message or warning I left there, don't be surprised if I move the discussion back to your talk page.
This page is set for automatic archiving every 7 days. I will remove talkback messages as acknowledgment that I have read the related reply, and I reserve the right to summarily remove any uncivil comments.

Thank you, and happy editing!

Re: Soppong Religion "Hoax"

Thank you for removing this page.

Even though this page was labeled as a Hoax, it was nonconstructive and a bad way to represent Wikipedia, as it is a very good site.

Thank you again for your contributions.

-Matthew — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matthewethanchowtoy (talk • contribs) 22:11, 17 December 2015‎ (UTC)[reply]

Genesis Flood Edit

Sorry about that. I tried to go back to the summary and went too far. It wound up saving it for me. Cadet_BNSF 64.4.232.125 (talk) 05:08, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding My Edit To Bella and the Bulldogs That You Reverted

There is a controversy about that show, and I added in those links to prove it. @21:18, 9 January 2016 (UTC) and Monster boy1:[reply]

@Monster boy1: The problem is, the links are not to reliable sources. Meme pictures are not reliable sources, and if any of the links were to screencaps or clips of the show, then that would be original research to say there's a controversy based on the clip. —C.Fred (talk) 21:43, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh okay, mind looking at this link I found and telling me if you think it's reliable? http://www.dailystormer.com/nickelodeon-hires-black-cuckold-fetishist-to-make-interracial-childrens-sitcom/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Monster boy1 (talk • contribs) 00:23, 10 January 2016‎ (UTC)[reply]

@Monster boy1: It's not. —C.Fred (talk) 00:25, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. By the way, your response was fast. Anyway, how do I prove that there is a controversy about the show's references to this fetish film called "The Cuckold." I don't know if you've heard of it, but how do I provide evidence of the show's sexual fetish controversy?

@Monster boy1: You need to provide reliable sources—generally speaking, that means coverage in mainstream media—that a controversy exists. The controversy needs to be significant to get mentioned. Every fan theory or conspiracy doesn't get covered in articles, but the major ones (I'm thinking of the hidden word sex in the animation of The Lion King), that have gotten widespread coverage, do. However, the coverage has to exist before they go in the Wikipedia articles.

One other thing: please remember to sign your comments with four tildes, which automatically generates a signature and time stamp. —C.Fred (talk) 00:41, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh okay. Thank you! :-) Monster boy1 (talk) 00:53, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry!

I read (red) something onine that Betty White died and then I look more in the story and then they said that she is okay and home. I'm so sorry! I thought she dead because that article said. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Darre123 (talk • contribs) 23:47, 9 January 2016‎ (UTC)[reply]

Blocked?

I didnt "disrupt" anything. Everything I put was true. LlamaWhoKnives (talk) 01:04, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@LlamaWhoKnives: Really? How can you say that this is true and constructive? —C.Fred (talk) 01:17, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

1) if you respond to this, HOW can I reply again? 2) whT does the logos mean when you warn me about getting blocked? LlamaWhoKnives (talk) 02:00, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@LlamaWhoKnives: You can add a message to the bottom of this thread. And the logos are just visual cues that go along with the standard warning messages. The colours go blue to orange to red as the warnings get more severe; final warnings feature a stop sign because that's a pretty universal symbol. —C.Fred (talk) 02:05, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I cant find the "reply" button to reply to you LlamaWhoKnives (talk) 02:08, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@LlamaWhoKnives: There's no "reply" button on talk pages. You just have to edit the section with the thread and add to the bottom. —C.Fred (talk) 02:21, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Like this? Sorry I'm new

@LlamaWhoKnives: Yep. Just don't forget to sign messages with four tildes. —C.Fred (talk) 02:39, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Idk what that is -LlamaWhoKnives

@LlamaWhoKnives: The squiggly characters (~) usually found in the top-left corner of the keyboard. —C.Fred (talk) 02:56, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cantor wally

The thesis link seems to say the person's name is Paul Henry Schachet-Briskin. https://sites.google.com/a/cantorwally.com/cantor-wally-home/home/cantor-wallys-masters-thesis-on-the-history-of-reform-jewish-youth

64.134.65.105 (talk) 04:34, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. My hesitancy is making sure that ties back conclusively to him. —C.Fred (talk) 04:35, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cantor Wally Schachet-Briskin was just created. 64.134.65.105 (talk) 05:02, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(I see you already saw that. Never mind.) 64.134.65.105 (talk) 05:03, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re Aidan Dove

I understand the reason for your change of the CSD template, and I don't disagree with what you put- but I had tagged it as a hoax because the dating in the article indicates the person got married at 9 years old (which is illegal in the US) and that his wife is dead already. Seems unlikely to me. 331dot (talk) 01:23, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot: Ah, I missed that. Either way, the article has now been deleted. —C.Fred (talk) 01:24, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Moved Mualim (District) to Muallim (District)

Hi, could you help move the old Mualim (District) page to the new page of Muallim (District) as it is a misspelled version. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JebatMalaya (talk • contribs) 04:24, 11 January 2016‎ (UTC)[reply]

@JebatMalaya: Already done. I did it last night. —C.Fred (talk) 17:08, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Page Deleted

I'm attempting to create a wiki page for my military unit and every time I create a page for a subordinate unit it gets deleted! How do I keep it from being deleted? Arsceditor