User talk:Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:35, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! - Cwobeel (talk) 19:54, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you are still not signing your posts in talk space. This is important so everyone knows who is saying what. Is there a reason you are not doing this? ―Mandruss ☎ 15:36, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Hard work

Excuse me, do you believe there is some sort of agenda in derailing you from this article? I will have to agree with that guy in the sense that you and some others are adding way too much information than what the article deserves. Some condensing is required for the main article at this point. It's a good thing for you the timeline article's currently there for all of this information that you want to put out. Parsley Man (talk) 15:36, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to me that someone is not willing to follow directions more than anything else... Parsley Man (talk) 00:51, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, there has been lots of discussion about condensing the article. Check the talk page and its archives. Surely the topic came up a couple of times before now. Seems to me you're the one trying to get his way. Parsley Man (talk) 03:09, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

barnstar

The Malheur Occupation Barnstar

For consistent and ongoing efforts at the Malheur article. LavaBaron (talk) 05:13, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:Occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge with this edit that didn't seem very civil, so I removed it. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it’s one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 17:17, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Bondegezou (talk) 17:38, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Since the warning template you were given does not mention block, I am adding here that personal attacks(insults) can and will result in blocking of your account. We need to maintain a friendly atmosphere here, especially when people disagree. HighInBC 17:58, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Template:Z33 Robert McClenon (talk) 18:32, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's unfortunate that so many with power on Wikipedia are so unaware of recognizing when an editor is being bullied, antagonized, gas-lighted, and pushed to the wall. --MurderByDeletionism^"bang!" 18:39, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stay off Occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge

Last chance. Stay off the page and we drop the ANI discussion, otherwise we make sure you are banned from Wikipedia. You can work elsewhere but stay off our page.