User talk:74.107.74.186

August 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Lincoln Chafee presidential campaign, 2016 has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Lincoln Chafee presidential campaign, 2016 was changed by 74.107.74.186 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950404 on 2015-08-10T23:33:09+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:33, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 06:18, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Endorsements

I have reverted your edit adding Matt McGorry to Endorsements for the Democratic Party presidential primaries, 2016. The cited Tweet does not indicate an endorsement. An endorsement is typically clear and unequivocal. An ambiguous hashtag plus a Halloween costume of a candidate are just not an endorsement. Thus, please don't add it back unless you have some other, much better source. Thanks. Neutrality^talk 03:41, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So, I assume you're going to clean up about....say.....minimum half of Clinton's endorsements on this basis too?

Anyone is welcome to do so, even you. I added a template at the top of the page to encourage people to do that checking. Here's how it is supposed to work: Wikipedia:Verifiability#Responsibility_for_providing_citations -hugeTim ^(talk) 20:00, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do it yourself.74.107.74.186 (talk) 20:33, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 16 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the List of Bernie Sanders presidential campaign endorsements, 2016 page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Hello, I'm Wikiisawesome. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Frothy— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. /wia /tlk 18:43, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page. -hugeTim ^(talk) 19:33, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

-hugeTim ^(talk) 19:41, 9 December 2015 (UTC)Template:Z33[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism, including on at least one article periodically edit-warring to repeat the same vandalism, over a very long period of time. Perhaps you think that you can get away with it provided you leave long enough intervals between vandalism edits: if so, this block is intended to get you to change that opinion. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 21:27, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reporting vandalism

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

Hi, someone is repeatedly edit-warring on the endorsements page for Bernie Sanders' presidential campaign. Despite the conditions listed already having been debated by the main editors of that page (myself, Book wormed, and others), the person is repeatedly inserting their personal bias and belief into it by repeatedly removing entries and calling me a "partisan." Please advise. 74.107.74.186 (talk) 20:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are perfectly right in pointing out that there is edit-warring in that article, and you are one of those edit-warring. Furthermore, I see that you have made no attempt to answer the reasons given on the talk page for the reverting of your recent editing, despite yourself exhorting others to discuss on that page. I have protected the article for three days to cause a break in the edit-warring. During those three days, consider the reasons given on that page for regarding your edits as unacceptable, and if you have good reasons for disagreeing then explain what those reasons are. If, when the article protection ends, you return to edit-warring, you may be blocked from editing. I see that you have given this talk page section the heading "Reporting vandalism", but what you refer to appears to be good-faith editing which you happen to disagree with, rather than vandalism. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 21:59, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on List of Bernie Sanders presidential campaign endorsements, 2016. Thank you. Chrisw80 (talk) 21:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page List of Bernie Sanders presidential campaign endorsements, 2016 has been reverted.
Your edit here to List of Bernie Sanders presidential campaign endorsements, 2016 was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://twitter.com/nancykaffer/status/706625598991540225) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 00:15, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Olision889 (talk) 00:35, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me? What 'disruptive editing'?

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.