User talk:FJY2013

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

FJY2013 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have communicate with a problem that I edit disruptively and I sent a rude message to Charkesdrakew. Because I also learnt that I edit nonsensical languages. But also I'm very sorry that I am not a very good editor. I was based in Singapore and I ONLY edited Singapore pages. I did not vandalise user talkpages.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I have communicate with a problem that I edit disruptively and I sent a rude message to Charkesdrakew. Because I also learnt that I edit nonsensical languages. But also I'm very sorry that I am not a very good editor. I was based in Singapore and I ONLY edited Singapore pages. I did not vandalise user talkpages. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I have communicate with a problem that I edit disruptively and I sent a rude message to Charkesdrakew. Because I also learnt that I edit nonsensical languages. But also I'm very sorry that I am not a very good editor. I was based in Singapore and I ONLY edited Singapore pages. I did not vandalise user talkpages. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I have communicate with a problem that I edit disruptively and I sent a rude message to Charkesdrakew. Because I also learnt that I edit nonsensical languages. But also I'm very sorry that I am not a very good editor. I was based in Singapore and I ONLY edited Singapore pages. I did not vandalise user talkpages. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Ways to improve Horton Automatics Platform Doors

Hi, I'm Rasimmons. FJY2013, thanks for creating Horton Automatics Platform Doors!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This article needs additional references to determine notability. This seems like a promising article, though.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. R. A. Simmons ^Talk 13:56, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Hello, how is my edit unsourced? I referenced to https://www.sbstransit.com.sg/download/wab_201601.pdf which CLEARLY states 208 wheelchair bus services plus 11 which is 219. Which part of that are you confused about? 33ryantan (talk) 13:59, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And one more thing, please brush up on your English and sentence structure. It is rather horrendous. Thanks. 33ryantan (talk) 14:06, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Mandai Depot, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Charles (talk) 10:27, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Changchun Bombardier Movia C951

I am not sure what you are getting at, but even the Straits Times make it clear they are jointly built by Bombardier and CNR Changchun right from the beginning. Source The two batches are the same. - Mailer Diablo 11:33, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you, and also please reply to your own talkpage and 33ryantan to reply to him, he is unhappy with Charlesdrakew. Please solve the problem.11:37, 6 March 2016 (UTC)FJY (talk)

Talkback

Well I'm not the Main user from Profile101. And I'm NOT the same from Profile101 as What I edited. And this GTX1975 was not the same as well. And the Profile101 Emails was not the same and was different. My account is FJY@yahoo.com. And the rest were different from me.