Talk:Dead of Night

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.

Horror Stub‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Not accurate, but...

E.F. Benson's short story "The Bus-Conductor" is actually the basis for the "hearse driver sequence", and Benson is credited as a writer of the film ("original story"). It is therefore inaccurate to claim that the original short story is a revisitation of the theme in another medium. I hesitate to remove it, however, because it isn't mentioned elsewhere in the article. Could someone please add a section discussing the literary basis for some of the film's story-within-a-story segments? All were short stories adapted for the film, two of them by their authors. 12.233.146.130 (talk) 19:55, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

==The film is not so much horror as supernatural (the last segment with the ventriloquist's dummy could classify as horror. "Horror" does not need ghosts to be horrific.~~

Come on, now

Seriously? We are just going to let people know that there is a twist ending, without letting them know what the twist ending is?! --Bertrc (talk) 20:42, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Of course! It's a spoiler otherwise! And it's quite a clever twist, although once you've seen it, I suppose you could say "saw it coming". It's pretty horrible for the time it was made! Does WP have a spoiler policy? You're gonna have to see the film, or look it up elsewhere.

Is it you who put the clarification marker on the main article? Take it off. It's a twist ending, there's no doubt.

188.29.165.226 (talk) 00:37, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Expansion

Since the film is considered a classic the plot should be expanded, information on the film's production should be added as well as the film's reception and legacy.--Paleface Jack (talk) 03:37, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, christ, here we go. You want to know the ending? Well this is a SPOILER so stop reading now cos I don't know how to do any clever tags...

SPOILER - SPOILER - SPOILER - SPOILER - SPOILER - SPOILER - SPOILER - SPOILER - SPOILER - SPOILER - SPOILER -

He starts the film arriving at the house, and is freaked out cos he seems to have been there before in a dream, he seems to know what everyone is going to say, what's going to happen. Just like in his dream. At the end of the film he gets all freaked out, then, all of a sudden... he wakes up! It was all a dream! He wakes up, then sets off to a meeting he has to attend... in a spooky old house. Yes, the house the film is set in. He's off to start the whole thing over again. Presumably it never ends!

Which is quite spooky eh?

188.29.165.226 (talk) 00:42, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]