Talk:Appeal

This article follows the Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Legal. It uses the Bluebook legal referencing style. This citation style uses standardized abbreviations, such as "N.Y. Times" for The New York Times. Please review those standards before making style or formatting changes. Information on this referencing style may be obtained at: Cornell's Basic Legal Citation site.

Template:Vital article

Law Start‑class Top‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Globalize

Beyond the history section there's hardly any specific examples of how courts of appeal works in civil law systems. Moreover, all the specific examples only mention the USA. It also mentions juries despite the fact that plenty of legal systems never (or at least very rarely) use juries and all (or nearly all) criminal or civil cases are only handled by judge(s). Either the article should be slightly reworded to avoid common-law/USA bias or how other justice systems handle appeals need to showcase. 95.155.235.73 (talk) 20:04, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Additions by User:Jz1234567

@DissidentAggressor: I didn't notice any specific factual errors in the changes to this article. Can you explain why you removed the content that was added by User:Jz1234567? Jarble (talk) 06:01, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think I understand the problem now: one of the additions includes a source that is not considered reliable. Jarble (talk) 06:02, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jarble: Yeah, that editor appears to only be here to promote lauderdalecriminaldefense.com. The Dissident Aggressor 13:08, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Article Overhaul

I am currently in the process of overhauling this article. I will return over the next few days to continue developing this. Feel free to pitch in if you like -- I plan to add discussion about the "originalist"/"living constitution" debate and the role of appellate judges in the judicial system. Notecardforfree (talk) 04:50, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]