User talk:Taric25

Archives

Beginning (2005)—November 2007
November 2007—April 2014

Emailed you

{{You've got mail}} Nil Einne (talk) 11:20, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Got it, thanks! Taric25 (talk) 20:16, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pollard Memorial Library and UMass Lowell Library Edit-a-Thon

March 28 - Pollard Memorial Library and UMass Lowell Library Edit-a-Thon #4 (final one) - You're invited

Date Saturday, March 28, 2015
Time 10 a.m. – 4 p.m.
Location University of Massachusetts Lowell South Campus Library 61 Wilder St. Lowell, MA 01854
Event An editathon on Downtown Lowell related Wikipedia articles with Wikipedia tutorials and Librarian assistance on hand.
Hashtag #wikiloveslowell or #glamwiki.
Registration http://uml.beta.libguides.com/wikipediaeditathons or use Wikipedia:Meetup/Boston/fourthlowell_editathon.

Yours, --LibraryGurl (talk) 18:04, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Written ASL Wikibook

Hey, I saw you have some interest in SignWriting. Thought you might be interested in helping to flesh out the SignWriting section on the Written ASL Wikibook! LeptonMadness (talk) 03:15, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not interested, since Signwriting is not encoded into Unicode. Taric25 (talk) 21:02, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Memes

You weren't being harassed, you were being warned: don't abuse Wikipedia to promote defamatory memes in violation of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. While we all know that it's impossible that Cruz could have had any association with the events, it doesn't exempt the circumstances from Wikipedia policy, and it's an inappropriate and defamatory tangent when included as a social trend. There's a discussion farther up the page about this already, and consensus has consistently held there and on other pages that it's not appropriate. Just because someone says something on the Internet doesn't make it suitable for inclusion in a global encyclopedia. Acroterion (talk) 15:25, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No, reverting and deleting edits of talk pages for asking why ubiquitous references to a topic is not present on a talk page is abuse. Abuse is also templating a review-rollbacker who has been on the encyclopedia for over a decade, which is disgusting, and your behaviour is deplorable. I simply asked why there was no discussion of the topic on the talk page. That's it. There is no reason for you to behave this way, and deleting any record of the discussion on the talk page is the very antithesis of collaboration. If you do this again, I will not hesitate to report you to ANI. Taric25 (talk) 21:00, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]