Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International reactions to the 2016 Turkish coup d'état attempt

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Dr meetsingh (talk | contribs) at 07:15, 16 July 2016 (→‎International reactions to the 2016 Turkish coup d'état attempt). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

International reactions to the 2016 Turkish coup d'état attempt

International reactions to the 2016 Turkish coup d'état attempt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

These "international reactions" articles are just WP:QUOTEFARMS of politicians offering "thoughts and prayers". In this case, we don't even know who's in charge or what the aftermath will be, making this doubly useless. WP:INDISCRIMINATE and WP:NOTNEWS are violated by this. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:44, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As creator I feel that it is precisely because this is a QUOTEFARM that it deserves its own article. There is now a well established precedent for these articles as a result of political events. Uncertainty over the actors and outcome of the coup makes it even more vital that we should be collating information from international leaders. Gareth E. Kegg (talk) 22:50, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Per nominator, this is an indiscriminate non-noteworthy quote-farm coatrack of entirely predictable, blasé reactions. Softlavender (talk) 22:59, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Selective merge to the main article. This is a quotefarm, a limited amount of which can be retained there. I don't believe we need an independent article for this; best to briefly summarize the reactions in the main article. GABgab 02:20, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge to main article as perWP:INDISCRIMINATE.  Dr meetsingh  Talk  07:15, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep The main article already has too many quotes in the international reaction section. Keep the quote farm here, not in the main article. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 03:08, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]