Jump to content

User talk:46.200.26.232

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 46.200.26.232 (talk) at 19:24, 20 July 2016 (it was restored correct squad per official team page). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

A cup of hot tea to welcome you!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (46.200.26.232) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! Gap9551 (talk) 22:55, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that [edit] places too much weight on only one source, the Daily Mail, a tabloid newspaper not generally known for its factual accuracy. Moreover, none of its claims were complemented on other news websites. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Egroeg5 (talkcontribs) 23:00, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • It was merged from duplicate article. What is uncorrect, you can change it, but don't remove infobox and categories please. BBC also said, it was 17-year-old Afghan refugee [1]. 46.200.26.232 (talk) 23:03, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit

@46.200.26.232: At first I was unable to determine the rationale for you edit. Now I see that it makes sense. Thanks. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 20:14, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • My apologies for reverting your two edits before, that was a mistake on my behalf. Best, Sam Sailor Talk! 20:45, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]