User talk:Gdo01

My Vandalism Stats:

Since 8/1/2006 11:27:49 AM, I've identified and reverted 1206 edits as vandalism.

Of those, 10 were not vandalism. (Accurracy: 99.17%) (See Log)

I make mistakes on RC patrol. (Report one)

Reba

Can I ask why you have reverted my edit on page Reba? There was no reason for that edit to be removed as that word describes Reba -posted at 01:57 EST on August 4, 2006 by User:65.31.100.211

Thank you Gdo01 -posted at 02:01 EST on August 4, 2006 by User:65.31.100.211

Sorry about the Colbert thing

My apologies. I just love Colbert. -posted at 11:20 EST, August 1, 2006 by User:Rytagg

Big Brother Pete Bennett

Please justify your reversion of my edit which was both verifiable and noteworthy leaky_caldron 20:09, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alfredo

Sorry

Hi Geraldo Im Alfredo and I wrote Kevin Smith is a fat ass on the magnolia article. Thanks for deleting it and Im sorry for writing. And by the way you found it 2 minutes after I wrote it.You are good.

Challange

Hi Geraldo I think what you do is great and I challange you to delete the things Im about to do to some articles. Every article that I vandalise would have your name Geraldo. It's just for fun. So let's start NOW. -posted at 01:37 EST on August 4, 2006 by User:Alfredosolis

Geraldo forget the contest thing I was blocked.Im sorry. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Alfredosolis (talk • contribs) 07:29, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Block Alfredo!

Interesting that Alfredo would show up on your user page. Of the very few articles I watch, he keeps vandalizing four of them--he repeatedly adds and re-adds images with no copyright information. On the Chas Tenenbaum and Royal Tenenbaum pages, for instance, he has now re-added the same images three times after they've been removed by OrphanBot. --Miss Dark 03:51, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sceptile and leaky_caldron

HOW DARE YOU! Deleting what I added about that losser PS. please replie to sceptile -posted at 17:14 EST on July 30, 2006 by SceptileSceptile

I made the edit. Whoever left the above did not and is probably trying to cause mischief leaky_caldron 21:18, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

I was about to delete the Halo 2 vandalism on Games Considered the Worst Ever Page, but I saw you already did that. Thank you for trying to help maintain the integrity of the article. guitarhero777777 02:54, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

anonymous editer

hello Gdo01, i was only warning that anoymous editer to stop reverting that article. i think that halo 2 is a GREAT game and i do not find it verry funny at all. thats all. many thanks Touth 02:59, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

your welcome! many thanks my friend. happy editing Touth 03:06, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism

hey the person from this ip 24.60.89.199, tried to add some non sens to the cosmo and wanda article. I noticed you told them before thought i'd run it by you. ChicanoJ 04:35, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Gdo01! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Computerjoe 's talk 15:24, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Gdo01! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Computerjoe 's talk 15:24, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I didn't do it. when i clicked toefl save changes it said the article conflicted with something else and half the content disappered. So I didn't do it. i just added a external link to the toefl section

the saint:

no shit or joking thats is the true story about why the saint choose a volvo p1800 read more here: http://www.btinternet.com/~therogermooreyears/Volvop1800.htm so be open minded you might even learn something from us swedes ( but i doubt it..)... -posted at 17:40 EST, August 1, 2006 by User:81.231.8.33

Mistaken vandalism

I am not the original owner of this IP address, my ISP just assigns them randomly. I have checked the vandalism warning from False Prophet, which applies to the former owner of this IP address. According to Wikipedia's definition of vandalism: "Vandalism is any addition, deletion, or change to content, made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of the encyclopedia.", the modifications by the former owner of the IP address were actually not vandalism since they did not compromise the integrity of the encyclopedia. I do not believe the changes to be much of importance, but I do believe it was not vandalism. I do not know if it is possible to do so, but since I'm the new owner of the IP, I therefore request the removal of that warning. Why not asking False Prophet? The reason is simple: he is in vacation and you have posted on my user talk.

24.37.160.221 05:35, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bad link in your User talk page

The "Report one" link at the top of your talk page seems not to be a valid link. 24.37.160.221 05:58, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

-edit: The link must be changed from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=User_talk:Gdo01&action=edit§ion=new to http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gdo01&action=edit&section=new 24.37.160.221 06:02, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Thank you.--Gdo01 06:03, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like you were faster than me on typing that one. =P Have a nice day!--24.37.160.221 06:04, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FLCL

As a userbox fan of FLCL, would you be willing to vote for its nomination at Wikipedia's Article Improvement Drive? If elected, it will be the subject of a week-long overhaul, in an attempt to pass in to Featured Article status! Thanks, Litefantastic 17:21, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit was not vandalism.

It was my belief that articles were supposed to be politically neutral. Claiming that Bush was "against civil liberties" is certainly not neutral. Nor is it a fact or piece of truthful information in any way. The worst part of all is the claim is not made in the context of someone’s beliefs, it is stated as fact. If even it were to read "some people believed..." or something along those lines. -posted at 13:36 EST, August 2, 2006 by User:12.146.190.92

Bush article

I would say that voting against one bill simply because it is named the "Civil Rights" bill does not mean that you are "against civil rights". That statement is a broad generalization which I'm sure Bush himself would disagree with. I fail to see why the prayer in schools would have to go, it is indeed fact that he supported prayer in schools, he has said so himself so that is very clear.

To summarize I believe the article should AT THE LEAST be changed to mention that he voted against the civil rights bill rather than a generalization that makes it appear as if he was against ALL civil rights. -posted at 13:47 EST, August 2, 2006 by User:12.146.190.92

Bleach Arc names

Do what you like. I'm currently going through the article history to figure out exactly who it was that invented those arc names in the first place. --tjstrf 22:25, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, as it turns out, it was Ynhockey. [1] I agree with the Soul Society arc name, but think the early story would best be called that: Early story or beginning, or something similar. --tjstrf 22:32, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism on Taepodong-1

To my knowledge, I have not added anything to the Taepodong-1 page, let alone even viewed it. What happened?--64.12.122.195 21:02, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiflaws:

I would like to interview you for an article. Would you accept? - posted at 23:15 EST on August 5, 2006 by User:24.65.75.224

IP address 72.181.73.209 has recently made vandalism to the Brownsville, Texas website (again, I removed it), and to the University of Texas at Brownsville website by calling the president "Tia Caca" (removed by me, as well).

I am not sure who I should report this to, bit i figure if I do it to you, it might be just as efficient. --Mcamargo 15:25, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gabriel

Hello:)

I had recently edited parts of Wikepedia on Gabriel, and you said it was vandalism. One of the edits I had made was on the Occult understanding of Gabriel. I put the Color "Purple" as Gabriel's color in addition to blue,and his rulership over the Kabbalistic Sephira of Yesod. All these attributions that I added are accurate. So your reversions are WRONG. Your email message to me accusing me of being a Vandal was very RUDE to say the least. I am a Kabbalist/Occultist and I have worked with Gabriel before. To check my attributions, read Dion Fortune's "The Mystical Qabala". In the future, do your research before accusing others of Vandalism. Also remember that anyone can edit Wikepedia, if it is a valid edit. So stop being a member of the Thought-Police. And please try NOT to be rude in the future, as you will receive the same treatment.

Blessings, --A Very pissed-off Kabbalist - posted at 16:49 EST on August 7, 2006 by User:207.126.223.29

Polygariffic!

Do you have a problem with Polygamy? -posted at 02:02 EST on August 8, 2006 by User:74.135.161.74

Amir Peretz

For your info, 67.190.106.134 put the same nonsense into the above article three times after you reverted it, and Tawkerbot2 reverted it each time. Those last three times were after you posted the warning on his/her talk page. I am sure there is a place to report this activity, but I do not know where. 6SJ7 17:51, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Kay article

How did that happen, I reverted the article as it had been vandalised and your are the person listed in History as editing it?

Strange, unless we both did the rv at the same time perhaps? -posted on 12:51 EST on August 9, 2006 by User:Pjb007

Thanks

Thanks for reverting vandalism to my talk page, regards, --Ali K 06:04, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

World Wide fund thing

Hey man, I see you sent me an PM, I know I'm vandilising, but, If you got the the Urban Dictionary site, some ppl are bashing there about WWF. Just Type WWF in the box, and you'll see what I mean --from User:Dekabreak

Edit: Sorry, my apologies, I just like wrestling, don't want to be mean or so. I just hate it when WWE changed. So sorry won't happen.

Revert of edits to The Colbert Report recurring elements

The revert you made to The Colbert Report recurring elements was clearly not a reversion of vandalism. While the anon contributions may not be worthy of including in the article, they certainly do not meet the criteria for Vandalism.–RHolton ≡– 10:55, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

V for Vendetta (film)

Thanks for correcting the pt-interwiki link. I'm running a Interwiki BOT and always have problems with these wrong links. --Meisam.fa 19:40, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen Colbert

Colbert first introduced the Called Out board on 8/14/2006, by placing John Steward on it to force an appology to Geraldo.

This is verifiable factual information. Look it up on Comedy Central or watch his show and you might know. This is a trivia fact not vandalism. Also by placing the underline on the H in John that is notating that it is mispelled.

Barrington Nova Scotia Possible Vandalism

Possible Vandalism on Barrington, Nova Scotia that you reversed was revandalize by user:89.213.1.100 on August 3,2006 .I reverted the edit .--Bill 23:11, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AWB

Hi Gdo01, just reminding you of an AWB rule:

Avoid making insignificant minor edits such as only adding or removing some white space, moving a stub tag, converting some HTML to Unicode, removing underscores from links (unless they are bad links), or something equally trivial. This is because it wastes resources and clogs up watch lists.

See you around! —Mets501 (talk) 15:01, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Colbert Bridge Incident

Hi Gd001, beside appreciating your heroic efforts making Wikipedia a better place, please consider that FACTS are not to be mixed with vandalism. Fact is that Colbert named a national hero of a foreign nation as "asshole" in his show (youtube it if you doubt) and affected members of a nation could hardly tolerate this. Maybe it is fun for Americans but not for Hungarians. The bridge name voting story shall contain this FACT too, not only the poll results. If a comedian makes fun of something, (s(he shall take all the responsibility as well. Best would be OMIT the whole name voting issue from the personal part because it is insignificant for Colbert's life but deeply offensing for national emotions of a EU country.

Also note that there are repeated tips and urges for voting, cheating or hacking the official vote page. Does it match Wikipedia rules? Don't think so.

Dear Gdo, still presuming your measures are for the overall benefit of the Wiki community and not merely on behalf of Colbert himself, let me point out that your message remarks are somewhat odd. Hope you do not mind.

First of all, Colbert's lack of knowledge is his very own problem and being stupid is seldom an excuse -- this is not a case. FACT it is that according to Hungarian regulation, things can be named after only dead people. If one knew it, never would start a name voting campaign for himself. Colbert started anyway, thus proofing he knows very little about Hungary. Period. He need not to -- but wise persons (even who plays stupid characters) gather information first, especially when encouraging over-the-internet service abusal. All the big voting campaign was in vain -- since Colbert is a living showman, all votes on him will be officially discarded. Lack of information can backfire.

You also defended Colbert('s character) as being stupid enough to make fun of Asian language. Another point of cultural differences: as far as I personally (being a European and a Hungarian adult) know, these jokes are regarded rather un-PC and offensive. Making dumb jokes about Asians (and not being criticized for it) is hardly an excuse. One who thinks this way (and makes/enjoys jokes such this) should take some lessons on history and tolerance. Maybe this should help to change the stereotypically senseless American approach of the outside world and to decrease cultural and other conflicts. EU countries are not 3rd world, "Asia" is not the same reference as Europe but even they/it were/was, never would be worth such behavior.

You also claimed that "Colbert (...) plays a character (...) bigoted and stupid, comments like the ones he made about Zrínyi Miklós are expected and purely satirical and not the views of the real Stephen Colbert." No problem, this is okay -- if one knows Colbert and his show. But he is well unknown over here, and again, think-first method could prevent him being identified with his character. Now chances are that Stephen Colbert's name get known in Hungary as "the person who named Zrinyi an asshole". Well paved way for a future local introduction for the man and his show, huh?

You also think you can decide whether the remarks such "Hungarian viewers typically found Stephen's remark about Zrinyi...senseless and repelling" are correctly based. You are wrong: calling any national historical hero an "asshole" IS offensive and repelling BY ITSELF, even if it was said by another angry undead historical opponent :) or an angry history expert which are again not the case. It was a primitive offense, nothing more, and as such it can be criticized without any further support. If you like, you may start any polling etc to prove that it was NOT offensive and repelling -- that is your free choice. To become civil is a good aim but being PC and practicing tolerance cannot be avoided if you want to reach it. Thanks for your attention and cooperation.

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Yorzan.JPG)

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Yorzan.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Fritz Saalfeld (Talk) 16:29, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

IP address discussion page

I was just wondering y a discussion page for my IP address was created. i have a login already, i just never use it cuz i'm too lazy to log in. i don't care, i just think it's a waste of resources for me to have two discussion pages. the preceding unsigned comment was left by 147.26.232.92

8th mistake.

The edit I made to the Hungarian Bridge page was not vandalism, nor uneeded. It is factual information, which most likely was the cause for the entire revision of the vote. --Real tymer 21:32, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, but I thought I made it pretty clear the Colbert himself disaproved of the ballot stuffing. --Real tymer 21:50, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In regards to the Bleach media change

I am actually 67.49.159.223 but I'm under my username which I forgot to sign in. Anyway, thanks for inserting the link to Beat Crusaders on the Bleach media page, when the bot reverted it back. I knew it was correct but I didn't know why the bot did that. Anyway, thanks a bunch and thanks for doing it so fast.

--DigitalKaede a.k.a 67.49.159.223

Borderline Personality Disorder

It does look like vandalism, but if you look at the talk page for BPD (the section about Famous Borderline Personalities), you'll see why the user removed the section--which was only added yesterday and was immediately debated. The section's really weak. --Miss Dark 04:06, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Northern M0 Danube bridge

Not used to having my images reverted before I even finish uploading them. The Colbert Report is certainly responsible for the vast majority of the buzz about the M0 bridge, so a screenshot seems reasonable. Could I at least ask that you use an edit summary in the future, instead of anti-vandalism programs? savidan^{(talk) (e@)} 05:15, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, its all good now. savidan^{(talk) (e@)} 05:16, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

R&B Singer Mya was born in 1979 and her 5th album Control Freak will be out in 2007

the only website that says that she was born in 1978 is imdb, which was a type-o and they take months to make changes (i've sent in a request). her official website ( http://www.myamya.com/ ; temporarily down) says it's 1979.

Control Freak will come out in 2007 (oficial mya website).

Please quit changing it... yesterday Control Freak wasn't listed and her birth year was 1981.

Anon user being a vandal again

I found and reverted edits by [[2]] at this page: [3]. Just thought I should point this out, since I noticed the user has been a vandal on many occasions. RobJ1981 04:18, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

George Bush

It was sarcasm. I used the same words he did to make a point that just because he says something, it doesn't make it a fact. Didn't you catch that? 2nd Piston Honda 06:16, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Personal att

Once again, this was not a vandalism, i really beleive that Academic challenger eats too much yoghurt or something