Jump to content

Talk:Pearle Vision

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 86.87.226.12 (talk) at 10:55, 26 September 2016. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Untitled

Stub

The last paragraph in the article needs review, whether or not Pearle Vision actually "rips off senior citizens", it should probably be restated using more neutral language. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.124.170.165 (talk) 08:34, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There are several consumer complaint websites citing Pearle Vision. Examples of issues on their Wiki were taken from these sites. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Valphoto (talkcontribs) 11:55, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just because there are consumer complaint websites, none are cited, and the wording of the last paragrah is atrocious and not neutral. Neutrality and Citability are the two #1 rules of writing for Wikipedia. The paragraph has been removed as it did not contribute anything to the article. If you want to write about their business ethics, do it more professionally and neutrally. That was not the way to do it in any form. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.223.21.11 (talk) 02:30, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Dutch Pearle Opticiens article links to this one. The problem is that it are two separate companies. Pearle Visions/Opticians in Europe is owned by HAL Investements. It is worth noting that Pearle Europe is in a separate company. http://www.luxottica.com/en/luxottica-group-sells-its-minority-interest-pearle-europe-hal-investments