Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arslan Sheraz

Arslan Sheraz

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Poorly sourced article, with some advertorial/promotional overtones, about a musician -- he may have a valid claim to passing WP:NMUSIC, but with inadequate sourcing it's hard to determine what's accurate and what's PR bumf. Initially I speedy deleted this G11 (unambiguous advertising and promotion), but then following a request from the creator I restored it to her own sandbox for improvement -- upon which she added a couple of unreliable PR blog sources and then copy-pasted the sandbox page back into articlespace again without actually addressing the tone problems at all. It was then flagged for G11 again by another editor, which in turn was almost immediately declined by still another editor. This all remains without prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can write and source a proper article about him that reads like an encyclopedia article instead of an EPK -- but this is still not appropriate for inclusion in its current form. Bearcat (talk) 18:59, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete ---No reliable sources found to establish notability, article needs much better sourcing and tone, as mentioned. ABF99 (talk) 03:38, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Don't Delete --- I am agreed with the wordings which are mentioned above and yes it was already deleted and I made a request for restoring it because I wanted to make some changes in it. And I also removed some content which was seems to be like promotional content however I am still making changes in this article and I hope within a day it will be completely changed :) So, rather than deleting kindly give me time for making changes and writing in a proper way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AngelaRola (talk • contribs) 04:08, 11 October 2016 (UTC) "" Recreated from scratch "" Hey, I put my hard work for recreation of this article and removed all the content which was seems to be promotional content. Moreover I also included his accurate information. Kindly review it again and remove this tag of deletion from the article after reviewing again — Preceding unsigned comment added by AngelaRola (talk • contribs) 06:04, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. This is the second AfD I've seen this week with an attempt to tamper with it by doing an early, improper close. —C.Fred (talk) 18:18, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
~~Don't Delete~~ ---This article should not be deleted as above I mentioned that I will take some time to make changes and I have done all things, I've removed the content which seems to be promotional while I also recreated the article from scratch, You can also review the article before anyone hit the delete button. There is a lot of hardowrk behind this article, Kindly don't remove it again and again over. AngelaRola (talk) 07:55, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Don't Delete --- I am not author of this article but I read this article just a few minutes ago and I didn't find any thing due to which this article should be deleted. However article needs to be improved. So, I think rather than deletion there should some tags be added for improvement of the article like if someone wants to help for improving otherwise there is nothing for deletion. Bearcat (talk) 18:59, 10 October 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Muzentwala12 (talk • contribs) Don't Delete --- This article has some flaws and needs lil bit improvement but I don't consider it to be deleted.damqalandar (talk[reply]