User talk:User732

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, User732, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Charlotte Bunch. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Omarcheeseboro (talk) 15:46, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Charlotte Bunch. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Omarcheeseboro (talk) 15:46, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Charlotte Bunch. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Omarcheeseboro (talk) 15:46, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please slow down

You're doing a good job of cleaning up the article, but I would suggest slowing down and reading about our policies. You can start with reliable sources to see why I keep on removing the blog reference. Also, I have taken the time to find this article which has earned a "good article" rating that you can use as a model: Barbara Gittings. Again, please slow down and read about policies before making an onslaught of changes. If you need help with locating a guideline or anything else, please write on my talk page. There is no rush to get this done. Thank you

--Omarcheeseboro (talk) 16:19, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In Reponse to Omarcheeseboro

Thanks for your helpful comments. I'm interested to know what brought you to Charlotte Bunch's page and why you're watching it. The reason it may seem like I'm rushing through edits is this has been on my to-do-list for quite some time, but I just found a few minutes to work on it, so I wanted to make as many improvements as possible in the limited time I had. I'll work on being more consistent with my edit summaries. User732 (talk) 16:48, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possible conflict of interest

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.

Another editor has started a discussion regarding your edits at the conflict of interest noticeboard. You can find the discussion here, you are encouraged to comment. Smartse (talk) 11:52, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]