Jump to content

Talk:The Broomway

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 80.114.146.117 (talk) at 05:19, 16 January 2017 (→‎Picture). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconArticles for creation Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Note icon
This article was accepted on 5 February 2013 by reviewer FoCuSandLeArN (talk · contribs).

Picture

This article would greatly benefit from a picture of one or two brooms, to give an indication of their appearance. Are any still in situ - or does anybody out there have any open-source pictures they could upload? ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 13:19, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The brooms are no longer there and I suspect they've been gone for at least a century.

Why?

It's fascinating that this dangerous, soggy way was ever considered a viable route to Foulness, and that anyone would choose it (as opposed to, say, taking a rowboat the short distance across Havengore Creek), let alone expend resources on the construction of the six headways. What were they thinking? GPS Pilot (talk) 08:29, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another why: Why didn't the track hug the high-tide mark more? Surely that would have been a lot safer? Also, after the split of the creek, both branches are at points less than 50 m wide. That's still a lot, and building a wooden footbridge would have been expensive... but they managed to find the resources to build the headways. Or they could have installed a rope-guided foot ferry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.114.146.117 (talk) 05:01, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

© ??

The photo loaded in Wikimedia should not be copyrigthed ? --Pascal Boulerie (talk) 16:08, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]