User talk:Drillstop

November 2016

Hello, I'm DVdm. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Special relativity, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DVdm (talk) 17:54, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits on Special relativity

Could you mind explaining how a letter and one paper disproves the entire field of special relativity? Seems the second paper addresses only Einstein's contributions, rather the entire field (and even then, it's debatable). Furthermore, please refrain from again replacing your edit, as that would be a violation of the three revert rule (WP:3RR). Kevin12 x d 16:18, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: also note that the source http://www.naturalphilosophy.org is not considered to be a reliable source for Wikipedia :"The John Chappell Natural Philosophy Society (CNPS) provides an open forum for the study, debate, and presentation of..." See wp:reliable sources and wp:FRINGE. - DVdm (talk) 20:06, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Time dilation, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 21:50, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]