Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chad Robichaux (2nd nomination)

Chad Robichaux

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

promotional bio. full of puffery and uncited praise. The athletic career does not seem to meet the requirements,and there is nothing else substantial. I would not have accepted this from AfC. DGG ( talk ) 09:51, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:57, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:58, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:58, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:59, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Falls in line with BLP guidelines, cited articles do not fall under the category of ROUTINE coverage and external links lend credibility to the information as determined by BLPEL guidelines. Additionally SPORTSPERSON criteria are met as professional recognition has been achieved and duly cited. Furthermore the criteria laid out ANYBIO of BIO are met. Fulfills the requirements of NBIO and the BASIC requirements of a notable figure. "Puffery" has been removed. Morrisowen8 (talk) 18:35, 5 May 2017 (UTC)— Morrisowen8 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Weak Delete He fails to meet the notability criteria for MMA fighters at WP:NMMA. He doesn't appear to have competed (or if he competed, he failed to medal) in a BJJ world championship so I see no evidence to show WP:MANOTE is met. There's nothing to show WP:NAUTHOR is met, especially since the books are self-published. I don't see the significant independent coverage required to meet WP:GNG since most of the sources are either routine sports reporting, blogs, or employers. There's a lot of sources, but not enough good ones to convince me of WP notability.Papaursa (talk) 18:11, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As per Papaursa. There is a bit of WP:OVERKILL going on.Peter Rehse (talk) 18:57, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As per Papaursa MMA achievements were removed. Morrisowen8 (talk) 01:01, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]