User talk:Aozolins-golin-riga

Proposal for a page

Just saw your note on Ad Orientem's page. It's fine that you disclosed that you were a paid editor, however, please take note of Wikipedia's policy on paid editors, found right over here . It's important that you follow such policy. Also, be aware that if you create a page for your company, any market speak will likely be removed, as Wikipedia isn't really a place to market services, only explain them in plain terms. Also be aware that press releases aren't reliable , so they can't be cited in the article

*DEFINETLY BE AWARE* that if your article makes it into Wikipedia, anyone can edit it, no one actually owns articles on Wikipedia, and this at times can cause a bit of consternation for companies, as the article can and would state things other than what the CEO or the principal of the company might desire it state.

I'm not telling you any of this to scare you aware, rather, it's to let you know what may happen if the article is accepted.

....That being said, best thing to do is to create a Draft Article, in draft space and have it evaluated by experienced editors. If it passes muster, it will be moved into mainspace. Before that, however, you may want to read Your first article as it will give you more information about what would be expected in that article.  Ҝ Ø Ƽ Ħ  14:29, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

April 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for canvassing a large number of admins to create an article for your client, while spruiking the firm. This is blatant advertising and inappropriate conduct.. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Nick-D (talk) 09:14, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Aozolins-golin-riga (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Did not know that there was a limit to approaching editors. I have learnt my lesson and will not make the same mistake in the future.

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Did not know that there was a limit to approaching editors. I have learnt my lesson and will not make the same mistake in the future. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Did not know that there was a limit to approaching editors. I have learnt my lesson and will not make the same mistake in the future. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Did not know that there was a limit to approaching editors. I have learnt my lesson and will not make the same mistake in the future. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}