Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parking crater

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

POV fork, essentially a duplication of other article's subject. Anmccaff (talk) 08:08, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A bit amusing to me that the creator won't even link to Parking lot in the first sentence, relegating it to see also. I'd say redirect to Parking lot since we do seem to have some popular usage. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:13, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, as drivers will park anywhere i initially thought this would be a discussion about how quickly they us a space cleared by an asteroid impact, anyhow this looks like a redirect and a couple of sentences at Parking lot.Coolabahapple (talk) 00:54, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Greetings from Europe! While it sounds like the existence of this type of "crater" is a foregone conclusion in America, I found the concept interesting as an outsider, since we don't have many of these here. That said, the current article clearly has some flaws. I would suggest keeping the article, adding academic citations to balance the popular ones and putting up a neutrality flag. And yes, as Shawn in Montreal said, they should link out to the page for Parking Log early in the article. If I have time, I'll go ahead and make those changes soon. Cajunerich (talk) 05:07, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]