User:Jsmorse47

Wikipedia is not a paper book, however many users feel that it should be limited in scope to whatever they deem notable. That is foolish and somewhat scary (imagine if the Internet in general had censors with deletion capabilities!). This website should exploit the great advantage of electronic media and not exclude any article unless it provokes violence or harm toward others. Links to unpopular articles should be limited, but the articles themselves should not. My hope is that people will start to create as opposed to delete. There is too much good to create to waste so much time on deleting!

The wiki is a brilliant concept, but for it to truly work, all participants must leave their bias at home, which may be too much to ask. The rules that promote censorship (deleting articles, 3RR) are a blight to the website and should be reconsidered.

Testimonials for [BMR] link

healthy information which has givev me inspiration, thank you! -Anthony

This all sounds so good. It all seems to be right on the key. -Yasmine

Thamks. Your analysis helped a lot. ! - Supriya

great tools! - William

Thanks a bunch! - Anne

Yay! I'm pretty happy with my results. - Ashley

Thanks. I'll recommend this site to others. -Orlando

thanks -Philippa

Thank you! - Oriana

Lowered bmi by 2 points. Raised my health score 112 points. - G

good stuff -Tim

Thankyou -Daryl

it is really helpful. thanks a lot. best wishes. -Nisha

Thanks, this was great! - John

Thanks for the evaluation. I've tried everything, including exercise and dieting before, but I suspect I know the problem - I never paid attention to my BMR and caloric intake. I ate good foods and very balanced meals for periods of time, but I definitely have eaten too much of it. I need to reduce caloric intake. Thanks for calculating my BMR - it will help. - John

Here's some great info - P

thank you for the help - Debbie

thanks -Elham

thank u for the input -Stephen

yay! -Natalie

This tool is great. I learned a lot of things. -Subodh

Interesting -David

Thank you! It was really nice. -Hasan

great site. thanks -Stephen

Thank you... -Cheryl

Thanks -Param

Thanks I needed a wakeup call. -Dane

Very informative -William

thanks -John

This was very informative! Thanks -Katherine

THANKS! -Viviana

Nice..... -Dick

Made me think... -a

I have no sugar in the house. Use Splenda.Usa canola oil,for grilled sandwich stirfry vegetables and e.g ground beef, lamb chop, rib steak, once in a while.Exercise , can't right now. eating shredded wheat, lactaid milk, splenda, for breakfast at times and sometimes before going to bed to curb sweet tooth. I found the tests beneficial and interesting at the same time. Thank You -Carolyn

Thank you. -Keith

drinking tap water 4 to 5 lit. per day i will try to reduce my weight -Surendra

Also I new 'about' howmany calories I needed to maintain weight but never the actual. This will help me as I strt my new regime. Thank You -Heidi

Joe, Your advice on weight loss was really helpful. -Chirstina

I WOULD LIKE TO LOSE WEIGHT BUT MOST OF ALL I WOULD LIKE TO FEEL BETTER ABOUT LIFE!!!! THANKS -RAYMOND

thankyou, it was very informative -Kusal

thanks for the suggestions.....your site helps a lot -Imelda

interesting -Maria

The report is very informative and agrees with what I am taught and worked out for myself, i.e. my BMI and BMR (am training to be a doctor). -Abby

Good Healthy information -Rama

thanks. -Becky

I rule! -Matt

Sweet -Jen

It's been really educational. Thanks! -Tracy

Hmm -Simon

Thank you for the info. -Elisa

thanks -Duke

thank you!!!!! -Tisha

thanks for the god info :) -Rob

thanks -Jenny

good -Clairol

This was great! I'm impressed. -Sharrhan

SIMPLE DIET THAT REALLY WORKS ... PROMOTE MOTIVATION -Jane

Thanks for doing this. Americans who work with me have AWFUL diets. -Miriam

Articles Created

List of geopolitical simulators (Where is this list now?)

Articles of Interest

Recently Wmahan has continued his crusade to remove spam from WP and has taken off some quality links (Talk:Basal_metabolic_rate#External_link, Talk:Logo#Removed_link) simply because I, a contributor to the links, added the external links or re-added them after someone else inserted them in the first place. My argument: let the link speak for itself-- if the link is not valuable, take it off, but if it is valuable, don't let the fact that a person affiliated with the link posted it, that is an abstraction and a blanket regulation that reminds me of the phrase, "throwing out the baby with the bath water." I would rather each external link be viewed for its merit, not who posted it.

Note: this has become a gargantuan expenditure of precious time, which I don't have. I only proceed for the principle.