Jump to content

User talk:75.166.118.17

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 75.166.118.17 (talk) at 19:11, 18 June 2017 (I don't like bullies). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

June 2017

Information icon Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to KAAM have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 17:53, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


What are you talking about? it was contructive.--75.166.118.17 (talk) 17:54, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, my mistake. CLCStudent (talk) 18:05, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No problem.--75.166.118.17 (talk) 18:06, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

75.166.118.17 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I believe that I was unfairly blocked. As you can see in the contributions there was no isuue today at all ranging from vandalism to personal attacks on other editors none of that. I would appreciate it if this block gets an in-depth review and be lifted--75.166.118.17 (talk) 18:43, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are a long term abuser known to us as the Denver LTA and you know it because you tried to have that page deleted.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 19:05, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


I not known to anybody. However, you all are known to me as The Wikipedia Bullies. I can tell you right now that the block is 100& percent unfair and if you look carefully at the contributions there was no problems except maybe grammar things here and there. but I can tell you right now the block is uncalled for.--75.166.118.17 (talk) 19:11, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]