Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isidro A. T. Savillo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Viperqwer (talk | contribs) at 12:21, 10 July 2017 (→‎Isidro A. T. Savillo). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Isidro A. T. Savillo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Long and superficially impressive article, but I am struggling to see how he passes WP:NACADEMIC or WP:GNG. Edwardx (talk) 10:20, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:55, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, even taking into account WP:CSB. Even if he is the same person as Isidro T. Savillo, his highest Google Scholar cite count is 9. He apparently has no academic position, let alone a named professorship or equivalent. He does not meet WP:PROF. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:54, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, This has been judged as a start page which means that there are significant achievements as supported by references then why delete? In the first place this is not a stub. There are achievements in the article that could provide his notabilityLancet345 (talk) 11:59, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, His discoveries are novel and are attributed to him. Why don't we give him a chance rather than be swayed away of what other people of saying to harm his name. If the article needs an edit, then why not do it.Viperqwer (talk) 12:20, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]