Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shailesh Pandey
- Shailesh Pandey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable actor, no significant coverage in independent reliable sources to support general notability guideline and no evidence of passing WP:NACTOR or WP:BIO. GSS (talk|c|em) 17:28, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 17:29, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 17:29, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: Not satisfying our basic notability standards for actors. KGirl (Wanna chat?) 18:38, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
- Neutral: I don't care what happens to this article, but why delete articles because some people recognize them as "not notable enough"? Even if they aren't that notable, isn't the point of Wikipedia to have articles on (almost) everything? You know what I mean. Just my opinion. 74.108.224.146 (talk) 21:36, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
- No, that's not Wikipedia is for. You need to read WP:Notability and WP:BIO. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:39, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
- But the lack of 'online' source doesn't prove that the person in not 'notable enough' .
- Do NOT Delete: Although i agree with Clarityfiend but i don't think this page should be deleted.This person has notable contribution in the development of Bhojpuri cinema.I don't care whether its deleted or not but it should exist on wikipedia.
Helpforwikipedia (Wanna discuss?) 09:13, 27 July 2017 (IST)