Jump to content

User talk:Carolus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Carolus (talk | contribs) at 10:52, 1 August 2017 (→‎D'Udekem d'Acoz family). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

De concordia inter codices moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, De concordia inter codices, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). Thus, I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Winged Blades Godric 10:25, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ai nostri tempi moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ai nostri tempi, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia).Thus, I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Winged Blades Godric 10:26, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Antonine de Mun, Duchess d'Ursel moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Antonine de Mun, Duchess d'Ursel, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. — InsertCleverPhraseHere 19:43, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Al my sources are gone????? what did you do?--Carolus (talk) 19:45, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Association of the Royal Residences of Europe

Hello Carolus,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Association of the Royal Residences of Europe for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Fbdave (talk) 00:39, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

D'Udekem d'Acoz family

Hi you have recently been transforming the above article into a genealogy page. The non-notable members of the family should not be represented as per WP:BLPNAME and WP:NOTGENEALOGY. Please remove the non-notable members of this family. Domdeparis (talk) 09:10, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not revert again before discussing and explaining. Domdeparis (talk) 10:21, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Wel, if you can offer me a suggestion that the family hierarchy + chronology, is clear, visible and respected, i will agree.--Carolus (talk) 10:23, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Have you read WP:BLPNAME and WP:NOTGENEALOGY? Do you understand why the family tree does not have it's place in this article? Domdeparis (talk) 10:25, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Because it is a noble House, not an ordinary family. HUGE difference in Belgian context.--Carolus (talk) 10:26, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Regardless of whether this is a noble family or not the 2 guidelines apply in any country. Non-notable family members should not be included in articles. Wikipedia is not a discriminent list of information. Domdeparis (talk) 10:29, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, but you delete ALL. Sop you are not consequent.--Carolus (talk) 10:31, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I had moved those that have their own page into the notable members section. Domdeparis (talk) 10:38, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, you are wrong, there are more notable people then just "they who have their own page". How stupid is that logic?--Carolus (talk) 10:41, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't de rude, you might want to read WP:CIVIL. You said I removed all names this is untrue. I told you that I had moved those that have their own pages (so definitely notable) into the notable members section. As per WP:BLPNAME "However, names of family members who are not also notable public figures must be removed from an article if they are not properly sourced". You have supplied names of children as young as 1 year old without supplying sources proving that they are public figures.Domdeparis (talk) 10:49, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OMG, Just beleave me 1st/ all adults are notable, most of them are politicians. It is clear you do not known anything about this family in Blgian context, who am i arguing with?? just waste of time. Can you please provide me sources that others are not notable?? You are not Belgian, so you cannot. --Carolus (talk) 10:52, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Carolus&oldid=793377909"