User talk:DerricktanJCW

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Ss112 09:59, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

sing! China

How could you know who the winner is before result is announced?! Super Wang 14:16, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, DerricktanJCW. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Billy Koh for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Billy Koh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Billy Koh until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cabayi (talk) 17:39, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sezairi Sezali

Hello DerricktanJCW,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sezairi Sezali for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Mark^Dask 03:18, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Conduct during Article for Deletion discussions

Greetings, I'm Exemplo347. I have noticed that you have been making duplicate !votes during Articles for Deletion discussions, and I'd like to ask you to stop. It's quite disruptive - feel free to comment as many times as you like, but only put Keep or Delete in bold ONE TIME. Regards. Exemplo347 (talk) 14:43, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Deletion of Child Actors' Articles

Hi DerrickTan

I don't understand why you are fighting so hard to remove all the articles on our child actors.

Is it worth it? To eradicate the achievements of these was-children? They cannot be child actors forever. But the fact that they had achieved that in their childhood and had an article approved for them is a sort of recognition. You could have just left them there, they have been there for years and they are not dead articles - some of them are even being updated in 2017.

The fact is that when they were child actors, the internet wasn't as widely developed and used. It thus explains why there are little records of them on the internet.

But I do not believe that their articles should be removed. I just do not understand why you are putting in so much effort to remove recognition and articles of our Singaporean child actors that have been around for awhile.

And can I just say, our Singaporean media was actually more relevant in those child actors' times compared to now.

I really do hope those articles can stay up, especially those who have award nominations and several titles of drama to their name. I feel like you're denying what little recognition Singapore has for our talent, past or present. Don't you agree that the entertainment scene in Singapore is already dying? I have asked around but most people nowadays only remember the child actors from way back, same as me. They don't even recognise any of those new actors who won awards and are 'full-time' Mediacorp artistes. That's the sad truth behind our media. Nobody cares anymore.

The more you delete, the more obsolete the Singapore entertainment scene becomes. I do strongly believe that what these child actors have done while they are young deserve some sort of recognition in order to cheer on the next generation, by remembering the past generation. It is sad that they had been there for years without a problem but we had to see them go in such a manner.

Please do reconsider it. There is no harm in letting these articles stay.

- Alex

I have replied you on King of Hearts' talk page (User talk:King of Hearts#Regarding the Recent Page Deletion for Singaporean Child Actors. It's funny how you come across so sincere here while you bitch about me on another's editors talk page (you think I wouldn't have known? lol). DerricktanJCW (talk) 12:15, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sing! China Title Card.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sing! China Title Card.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:55, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Da Funny Dude (talk) 14:09, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]