User talk:XRii

OK xrii, no problem with you changing that UM paragraph back to what you had before. Just thought it was a bit heavy/wordy for intro. Wokit14 (talk) 03:49, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take another look and see if it can be cut down..Might be best to keep these kind of replies on the article talk page for everyone to view lest we appear to be making decisions without consultation. Cheers. XRii (talk) 04:02, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Xrii. You should notify in the "dissatisfied with content" section at top of talk page, as I have, that you want to create a para on the Medical Observer article about Federal funds going to UM via the YWCA. Then see if any opposition or comments. The bottom of talk page gets a bit heavy at times. Wokit14 (talk) 08:35, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, XRii, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! smileguy91^talk 01:26, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted post

Care to explain why you deleted Wokit's post on the Universal Medicine talk page? Make sure that that never, ever happens again. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 12:44, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, as far as I know I posted a reply below yours. If I deleted Wokit's post I apologize but I certainly didn't intend to and I'm not sure how I did it. Sorry. XRii (talk) 13:27, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK. But please be more careful in the future. I was a bit shocked to see that, and that's why I asked for an explanation. All the best! Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 17:54, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I realise what happened now. I was editing at same time as someone else and late at night! Don't remember a warning message coming up before saving for that one. It happened again the other day and I got a message allowing me to fix it without deleting other person's edit. XRii (talk) 05:25, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK XRii apology and advice accepted. Choose12 is purposely disruptive. I announced my intention of that new paragraph 3 days before, nobody objected or commented. Then after I edited she whined about it with complaints which don't fit WP standards. Wokit14 (talk) 20:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Atmic

I stand corrected! 79616gr (talk) 05:10, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No biggie. It's unusual language and perfectly understandable to think it a typo. Thank you for the clean up. Article reads better.XRii (talk) 05:21, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Hello, Please help me with...the New Religious Movements category for the Universal Medicine page. A New Religious Movements category page exists here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:New_religious_movements but comes up redlined when I used the Category template. Thank you in advance.

XRii (talk) 06:07, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category and article names are case sensitive, so I've changed the category name to "New religious movements". Rotideypoc41352 (talk) 07:06, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cite

Thanks for your edits on the Universal Medicine page, they read really well. I did notice the cite for the paragraph on race has been lost. I did not want to revert and mess up what you are doing, but it would be good if you could add it back in again. 79616gr (talk) 17:39, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The cite is intact. It has been renumbered automatically to 11. XRii (talk) 21:21, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, someone restored it today. 79616gr (talk) 21:34, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks for letting me know. Your edits were good after mine. Article is reading much better thank you. XRii (talk) 22:23, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

XRii and 79616gr. The article reads very well after your edits. Better than my English. Thank you both. Rxet (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 22:57, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Phoenix Global, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hacker. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment

Your recent comment at Talk:Phoenix Global got lost after some damage control and I couldn't just restore it at some random section, please feel free to post it again. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 13:40, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey XRii, I have reposted your RS link of 730 report back on the talk page, mainly due to the importance of that RS. There is no logical excuse to why it was deleted in the first place, and no need for that admin to bang-on with his excuses on the talk page - for gods sake! I know for a fact other editors would love to contribute to the PG WP page, but will not due to the extreme Wikilawyering obsession by some admins. That talk page is a dogs-breakfast. But thanks for your contributions, they are thought through and excellent. Zxcv9 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 22:22, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey XRii, thanks for the tough-love(?) comment. FYI I put a heading Indefinite protection of Phoenix Global article page over on the talk page, you may want to put the word "support" under it if you agree. Cheers, Zxcv9 (talk) 02:09, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Word tot he wise

You're better off leaving non-SPAs to discuss the Universal Medicine promoters. Guy (Help!) 21:50, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]