Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/78.55.74.227

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 78.55.74.227 (talk) at 19:54, 7 October 2017. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


78.55.74.227

78.55.74.227 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

07 October 2017

– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.

Suspected sockpuppets

Persistent sockpuppetry at Category:People from Valozhyn Raion and other categories. User is constantly reverting other people's edits and I can see a clear pattern that this IP is involved in sock puppetry. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:40, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe User:Pkbwcgs reads Wikipedia:SOCK. Edits done without creating an account and without logging out do not fall under the text in Wikipedia:SOCK. Also note that User:Pkbwcgs has been reported as a user vandalising category pages of Belarusian districts at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Belarus, reverting reverts using TW https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/Pkbwcgs&offset=20171007193721&limit=30&target=Pkbwcgs . 78.55.74.227 (talk) 19:48, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Harassment by Pkbwcgs

At IP talk s/he accused the IP of vandalism. But there is no such thing. Then it was turned into SOCK allegations. There is no such socking.


Stop icon This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Category:People from Slawharad Raion, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:34, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Pkbwcgs, where is the vandalism by 78.55.74.227? 78.55.74.227 (talk) 19:35, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The vandalism is you reverting other's edits continuously which is considered disruptive and you behaving like a sock puppet of User:2015-10-06a and I will start a discussion regarding sock puppetry from you and there is a clear pattern of it which I can see. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:37, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pkbwcgs, reverting another user is not enough to constitute vandalism. Here it is the other way around, the user that is reverted did vandalize. See disc at WP:CFD 78.55.74.227 (talk) 19:39, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@The Blade of the Northern Lights: User:The Blade of the Northern Lights is an experienced administrator. I do not doubt this user at all that this user is making wrong edits. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:44, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is English Wikipedia made to allow people to spread false claims? 78.55.74.227 (talk) 19:54, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments