Talk:Mark Schwahn

Biography: Arts and Entertainment Stub‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

External links

Removed some external links that may possible used as sources. Dumping them here:

Tomdobb (talk) 16:56, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

undue section

When "allegations" make up the longest section in a BLP, it is very likely that "undue" has been hit. Collect (talk) 21:47, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Allegations" have been made by 45 women. This is the first case in history where an entire cast (and in this case, TWO entire casts) of a show have joined together to publicly accuse a showrunner and have him removed from a show. It has been reported extensively on by hundreds of reputable news sources, and is in fact now the thing he is most famous for, by far.

Erasing the number of women who have accused him (and the names of very famous women in that group) AND even erasing what they accused him of - while leaving only the name and statement of the ONE woman who defended him - is obvious bias. Lib2003 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:18, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's undue, and you do not have consensus for the additions Darkness Shines (talk) 19:21, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

These allegations by 45 women are historic - the first time that an entire cast has joined together to accuse a showrunner of abuse publicly, and it has happened to Mark Schwahn TWICE with two different show casts within a week. These allegations have been reported on by hundreds of reputable sources and are by far the thing he is now most famous for. They deserve more weight in the article.

It is clear and extreme bias to repeatedly erase the names of numerous famous actresses (Hilarie Burton, Sophia Bush, Daphne Zuniga, Danneel Harris, Bethany Joy Lenz) who have made allegations of sexual abuse against him AND erase the allegations they made AND their quotes AND the fact that 45 women have come forward, all while leaving in the name and quotes of the ONE actress who has said the abuse didn't happen (Elizabeth Hurley) and giving her statement far more weight than the statement of the 45 women who said otherwise but whose statements you deleted. This is obviously intended to minimize the accusations and indicate that the one woman dissenting is telling the truth while dismissing the 45 women who say otherwise. That is not justifiable or good practice.

Instead of erasing the women who have made the allegations and the nature of their allegations over and over and threatening to ban me for objecting, consider how biased the editing is. Lib2003 (talk)

P.S. You can ban me for pointing out your obvious bias if you really want to, but I'll just change my IP address and be right back editing within five minutes, so it won't do you any good. Lib2003 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 00:16, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

P.P.S. The person who keeps reverting to their biased edits doesn't even have the facts correct - in trying to erase the actual facts I placed in the article, they have included several statements which are patently false; for example, Audrey Wauchope never even named the show where she was harassed or Mark Schwahn and the article now says she did. The source does not say that at all. Lib2003 (talk)