Talk:Herb Sutter
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Untitled
Herb Sutter is my uncle! He is a real cool guy. Keep reading his books!
- Will do... actually his website has awesome info as well for those curious :) RN 12:53, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
Patent controversy
Sutter's name is on US Patent 7496889, "Whitespace Keywords". On reading this document, there are countless nonsensical statements (the whole premise of keywords with a space in them is trivial). At one point it goes into
(LAN) and wide-area networks (WAN). LAN technologies include Fiber Distributed Data Interface (FDDI), Copper Distributed Data Interface (CDDI), Ethernet, Token Ring and the like. WANtechnologies include, but are not limited to, point-to-point links, circuit switching networks like Integrated Services Digital Networks (ISDN) and variations thereon, packet switching networks, and Digital Subscriber Lines (DSL).
Any compiler developer would write this work off, but the article suggests some pre-eminence. What's the deal? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.142.179.118 (talk) 04:23, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
Patent controversy continued
If I remember correctly. In the process of developing Microsoft's variant of Visual Basic they had a problem of making it compatible with existing implementations due to a (as I remember it) keyword and a patent. Microsoft could not make the languages compatible. I am sure someone knows more about it and can correct my wrongs. I think it is something similar we see whith this patent. Here Microsoft are trying to protect their Common Language Runtime (CLR) (or C++ .NET) from being copied. That no one should be able to make a system compatible to the .NET C++ version of Microsoft. That's at least my theory.