Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Billboard Mainstream Top 40 chart achievements

List of Billboard Mainstream Top 40 chart achievements

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I see no point in having a separate article for the list of chart achievements. Notably, it may make sense to have the List of Billboard Hot 100 chart achievements and milestones and the List of Billboard Hot Country Songs chart achievements, but it doesn't for any other chart, because there are too few entries for this chart. Not only so, the content on this page was originally on the main Mainstream Top 40 page, and there seemed to be nothing wrong with it. And now, it is on this page. Without the records and achievements on the main page, it looks more like an article stub. The point is, this page is just an unnecessary extension of the original records and achievements section on the main page, and having the records and achievements section on the main page is more sufficient. CheetaWolf (talk) 16:32, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. CheetaWolf (talk) 16:49, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CheetaWolf (talk) 16:49, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CheetaWolf (talk) 16:49, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Mainstream Top 40. All the info was copied and pasted from there and there's no need for a split. If anything, the trivia achievements on a secondary chart should be pruned. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 16:54, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and redirect, this is basically a clone of the records and achievements section on the original page. Mathwizard888 (talk) 01:57, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I really like this page. I think that it is useful. Sugarpuff888 (talk) 03:03, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ILIKEIT, WP:ITSUSEFUL Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 03:32, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly this is not a valid reason for retention. CheetaWolf (talk) 13:27, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't care. I like it and that's final. No one can delete it. Sugarpuff888 (talk) 16:53, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]