User talk:Amy wamey

Persistent Vandal spotted

They are constantly adding biased and inaccurate info to the career section of KSHMR

This is the vandals page https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Anmolbhat Amy wamey (talk) 22:30, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Take your proposed compromise to Talk:KSHMR. It does not belong at Wikipedia talk:Administrator intervention against vandalism. General Ization ^Talk 20:18, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I was unable to add it to the original section.

January 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kshmr. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Considering I explicitly stated why this wasn't vandalism and was in fact the correct wording to use based on the sources, I'm not sure why you continue to push this edit and make bad faith accusations towards another editor. Additionally, I have a suspicion that you are using multiple accounts and editing while logged out. This can lead to being blocked indefinitely for abusing multiple accounts. -- ferret (talk) 18:11, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:Anmolbhat, you may be blocked from editing. -- ferret (talk) 18:13, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Kshmr shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. regentspark (comment) 20:19, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kshmr

How is removing a name a typo? --NeilN ^{talk to me} 20:33, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a typo because the song is credited by being by KSHMR & Dzeko & Torres. (Or sometimes KSHMR, Dzeko & Torres) as Dzeko & Torres were (at the time) one duo and not separate artists. And the vocalist was not given featuring credit in the song (it was just billed as by KSHMR & Dzeko & Torres)

Rodrgz is mentioned in the source. You can't omit him without a clear explanation as to why. And you can ping me by writing {{ping|NeilN}} and remembering to sign your posts with ~~~~ --NeilN ^{talk to me} 21:53, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information on pinging. I have a possible suggestion. Maybe add "featuring uncredited vocals from Rodrgz" as that both clarifys that they were involved and that they were not a credited artist at the same time @NeilN:

United States of America

Please stop adding "United States of America" to the lead of US cities and towns, as a) it is not necessary unless there is another city and state with the same name somewhere other than in the US, and b) where it is needed, "United States" will do. General Ization ^Talk 21:52, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple countries have similar titles. Eh. United Mexican States. And some people know the USA as "America" more than "united states" it's purely intended to give the article more clarity