Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Watchtime
Appearance
- Watchtime (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article written as an Advert. Sources are primary and fails WP:NMEDIA and WP:GNG Hagennos (talk) 19:05, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. (And for transparency reasons: Yes, I obviously am the page author) the issues addressed have been corrected, the publication is the only watch magazine available at newsstands in the US and regularely cited/quoted within horology-related content of the English version of Wikipedia, its only comparable Asian competitor Revolution_(magazine) does have a page. Thanks for reconsidering. Rruegger (talk) 15:20, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - Subject lacks secondary independent coverage establishing notability. Meatsgains(talk) 19:12, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. L3X1 Become a New Page Patroller! (distænt write) 00:33, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. L3X1 Become a New Page Patroller! (distænt write) 00:33, 29 January 2018 (UTC)