Jump to content

User talk:Heliosxeros

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Nephron (talk | contribs) at 01:38, 26 February 2018 (→‎Minetest - why not an article?: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Hi Heliosxeros thankyou for reviewing my article, actually i am first time editing an article. I rewrote it but dont know if its been resubmitted? How do i know?

Draft 18.02.04 M. Kooshesh — Preceding unsigned comment added by Managermk (talkcontribs) 21:47, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Submission declined; ITF Junior Masters

Submission is improperly sourced is what you said. Every piece of information is sourced from official sources (ITF), from the root source. Every piece. How is it improperly sourced???? I demand an explanation. If ITF is not reliable than you can immediately shut down wikipedia as all of its sources are crap/fake/non reliable. Apart from souring, many parts of the submission won't qualify. Which parts?? This is a new tournament. You have all the information that can be expected from a tournament page at this stage of the tournament. If this is not adequate than you can direct your attention to, for example, pages of tennis exhibition tournaments which can read like an advert to quote you. I will correct myself, they are adverts, for jewelry company and such. 213.149.51.161 (talk) 11:52, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 18:31:56, 13 February 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by PatPiWilliams


Hi, can you please give me some examples of things in the Hong-Mei Xiao draft that need inline citations? Thanks, PatPiWilliams (talk) 18:31, 13 February 2018 (UTC)Pat PatPiWilliams (talk) 18:31, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

17:49:39, 14 February 2018 review of submission by Lima2917


Hello and thank you for reviewing this submission! Can I get some help regarding the references? I have included references from BBC and CNN and the subject has mentions all the internet but mostly from Greek media. The videos I linked are from big events (GoogleIO, Ignite, .conf) and there are even videos from BBC.

Any help is appreciated!

Thanks Lima2917 (talk) 17:49, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

19:41:27, 14 February 2018 review of submission by Alleny73


Hi there,

Would you mind providing further clarification on why this submission was declined? We wrote it based on information that our references provided. Is it because some of our references were not in English? Any tips you could give would be great! Thanks! Alleny73 (talk) 19:41, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Womenempowerment/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.delhi.gov.in/wps/wcm/connect/lib_dcw/DCW/Default/Swati+Maliwal. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Zawl 12:01, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

16:02:14, 15 February 2018 review of submission by Alena Ross

{{SAFESUBST:Void|

Dear Heliosxeros, I fixed the mistakes and now please check the updates I made according to Your remakrs about the references (that was my main mistake through the article). Please don't forget that the sources may repeat cause of the reasons I mentioned earlier (about the breed founder). Thank You! Alena Ross (talk) 16:02, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

07:22:55, 16 February 2018 review of submission by Dentuso13


Kequyen is involved with a number of interesting projects including 2 books. I think people would be interested to know that he's more than just an athlete and pharmacist. At the time that I made my initial submission, www.theprimaldesire.com/kequyen-lam was the only resource with information about the upcoming books, but now they can be found on www.kequyenlam.com as well. Dentuso13 (talk) 07:22, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember to check for copyvio

Hi Heliosxeros and thanks for your work reviewing drafts. Please remember to check for copyright violations. The particular one I saw was Draft:Cancer Council NSW, which was copied from https://www.cancercouncil.com.au/about-us/ and https://www.cancercouncil.com.au/about-us/celebrating-60-years. Thank you, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:32, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

07:00:27, 17 February 2018 review of submission by MurdochNewman


Hi, Heliosxeros

I'm wondering why the source cited was considered unreliable? I've provided a link to the Church's own website and in particular a page which reproduces a centennial narrative published in 1988 and retrieved from the Church archives.

Tom MurdochNewman (talk) 07:00, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

10:31:00, 17 February 2018 review of submission by Lcvoet


Hi can you help me to get this page corrected so it can be published? there are similar pages like my page e.g. Constellium. Thank you. Lcvoet (talk) 10:31, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

03:37:42, 19 February 2018 review of submission by 98.144.183.245


Can you please check. I have made the changes. 98.144.183.245 (talk) 03:37, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

10:47:07, 19 February 2018 review of submission by Jijugs


Like every other press release company, you have listed the same we added our details too. We tried when someone reaches Wikipedia and search for omnesmedia.com they should get what it is and how its work

Jijugs (talk) 10:47, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lay 02 Sheep, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Weibo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

15:38:19, 19 February 2018 review of submission by 99.139.170.160


I have made my changes a while ago and no one has responded. I've worked really hard to get the article corrected. Please advise/approve if possible.

99.139.170.160 (talk) 15:38, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

talk I am currently held up at the moment with the heavily backlogged AfC submissions. It'll be better if other reviewers review your submission for a more neutral judgement. BTW, your name didn't appear on the contirbution list of the submission page. If you already have a Wikipedia account, it'll be better if you log in with your account. EROS message 16:14, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 16:57:40, 19 February 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Winnie-too


Hi, I do not understand why the page on Agile Learning [1]was considered advertisement. Agile learning is a concept that spreads out among educational scientists and researchers in Europe. Some base it on research and some apparently not. There is noboby owning this, nobody making money with it and nobody paying royalties. Instead it is an issue in several research projects, one of them currently funded by the EU and involving several countries. The page is meant to give an overview to interested parties on how the term is used and where the discussion takes place at the moment, citing 15 sources from a number of countries - including the US, where it does not seem to be very popular. A lot more research papers, publications and web pages had been checked but did not seem to contribute something substantial. We would be glad to be informed about more cntributions - also critical ones if they exist somewhere. But please allow the discussion and development of the term and the concept to continue. Thanks and all the best Winnie-too (talk) 16:57, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Winnie-too (talk) 16:57, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

17:32:25, 19 February 2018 review of submission by 99.139.170.160


I have made my changes a while ago and no one has responded. I've worked really hard to get the article corrected. Please advise/approve if possible.

99.139.170.160 (talk) 17:32, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 09:49:19, 22 February 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by LaurentiuBC


Hey Heliosxeros, first of all thank you for reviewing the draft I've submitted. The fact though that the draft has been rejected makes me wonder why the cited sources are not reliable. There are other apps like ours that have pages, and their sources are less credible - please have a look at this example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_Doctor. If those are credible sources and ours aren't... and in our case, what would be a reliable source? Thank you.

LaurentiuBC (talk) 09:49, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jackie Shroff

Dear Heliosxeros! I saw in article Lay (entertainter), Jackie Shroff not filmed in Kung Fu, undo please Jackie Shroff from Lay (entertainter)? Thank you! --92.100.165.246 (talk) 17:29, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Lay's Endorsement, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

16:06:49, 23 February 2018 review of submission by Bgrandone80


Hello, I don't understand how I can improve the article. The comment refers to lack of reliable sources and I've cited the Business of Fahion, The New York Times, the Telegraph, among others. Should I add more or change something? Please help

thank you!

Bgrandone80 (talk) 16:06, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Minetest - why not an article?

I am surprised at how things have developed during my extended editing holiday. Minetest (draft here) ought to be an article. There is a significant article on the German language edition[1] and half a dozen other language editions of Wikipedia have article. There is a glowing review.[2] It certainly is notable enough. I think the article would develop... the delete re-delete strikes me as something foreign to Wikipedia. Nephron  T|C 01:38, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]